Anewstip vs Qwoted in 2026: outbound journalist search vs reactive source marketplace
Anewstip indexes 1 million-plus journalists by recent tweets and articles so you can pitch outbound at scale. Qwoted flips that around: journalists post source requests and you respond, capped at two pitches a month until you pay.
Anewstip
Qwoted- Anewstip lets you search a database of 1 million-plus journalists by recent tweets and articles for outbound pitching. Qwoted is inbound: journalists post source requests and you respond to what is already open.
- Qwoted has a genuinely usable free tier: expert database access, daily opportunity emails, and real-time alerts (2-hour delayed). Anewstip's free tier gives you search and two media lists but zero pitching capability.
- Anewstip's $200/month Standard plan includes 1,000 pitches. Qwoted's $149/month Pro plan caps pitches at 35.
- Anewstip offers API access on its Professional and Partners plans. Qwoted has no API on any tier.
- Qwoted explicitly supports podcast guest booking alongside traditional press requests. Anewstip has no podcast-specific tooling.
- Qwoted's Teams tier adds white-label delivery and a team dashboard for agencies. Anewstip has no white-label option at any price point.
Anewstip and Qwoted both get filed under "media database" but they solve the PR outreach problem from opposite directions. Anewstip is a search tool: you look up journalists by topic, see what they have recently tweeted or written, and pitch them directly using contact data pulled from a 1 million-plus journalist index. Qwoted is a marketplace: journalists and podcasters post what they are looking for, and you respond to their open requests rather than cold-pitching on your own initiative. That structural difference shapes everything else, from pricing to who each tool actually suits. Anewstip charges $200/month for 1,000 pitches once you are past the free tier; Qwoted lets you use its expert database and daily opportunity emails for free but caps you at two pitches a month until you upgrade to Pro at $149/month.
The tools at a glance
Anewstip
Journalist search and media outreach platform built on Twitter signals and article indexing
Anewstip is built around the idea that a journalist's recent activity tells you more than their masthead does. It indexes over 200 million news articles and a billion-plus tweets, letting you search for journalists by topic and see what they have actually written or tweeted about lately, alongside their email and phone contact details pulled from a database of 1 million-plus contacts.
The workflow is entirely self-directed. You search, you build a media list, and you send the pitch yourself using the built-in tool, which allows 1,000 sends a month on the $200/month Standard plan and 5,000 on the $400/month Professional plan. There is no requirement to wait for a journalist to post a request first, which matters if your story angle is proactive rather than reactive.
The free plan gives real search access and two media lists but no pitching and no email addresses, so it functions as a trial of the search quality rather than a usable outreach tool on its own. API access, which lets agencies wire journalist data into their own reporting, is limited to Professional and Partners, and Professional is billed annually.
| Feature | Free $0 | Standard $200/mo | Professional $400/mo (annual) | Partners Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitches per month | 0 | 1,000 | 5,000 | Unlimited |
| Media lists | 2 | 20 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Email and phone access | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Export media lists | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| API access | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Qwoted
Expert source marketplace connecting journalists, podcasters, and PR teams with credible voices across every industry
Qwoted runs a two-sided marketplace instead of a searchable contact database. Journalists and podcasters post what they are actively looking for, and PR people or subject-matter experts respond to those open requests. Built since 2017 by people with media backgrounds, the platform is structured around live sourcing moments rather than cold outreach.
The free Basic tier is the strongest part of the offer: expert database access, daily opportunity digest emails, and real-time alerts with no credit card required. The catch is a 2-pitch-per-month cap and a 2-hour delay on alerts versus paying users, which matters when a journalist is working against a tight deadline and paid competitors see the request first.
Podcast guest booking is built into the same workflow as traditional press requests, which is a genuine point of difference since most PR platforms treat podcasts as an afterthought. There is no API on any tier, so Qwoted stays a self-contained tool rather than something you plug into a CRM or reporting pipeline.
| Feature | Basic Free | Pro $149/month | Teams Contact for pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pitches per month | 2 | 35 | Unlimited |
| Real-time alerts | 2-hour delay | No delay | No delay |
| Pitch intelligence | No | Yes | Yes |
| White-label delivery | No | No | Yes |
| API access | No | No | No |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Anewstip | Qwoted |
|---|---|---|
| Core workflow | Outbound: search journalists and pitch them directly | Inbound: journalists post requests, you respond |
| Free tier includes pitching | No (search and 2 lists only) | Yes, capped at 2/mo |
| Pitches at entry paid tier | 1,000/mo on Standard ($200/mo) | 35/mo on Pro ($149/mo) |
| Starting paid price | $200/mo (Standard) | $149/mo (Pro) |
| Podcast guest booking | No | Yes |
| API access | Professional and Partners plans only | No, on any tier |
| White-label delivery | No | Teams tier only |
| Media list building | Yes, up to 20 lists / 1,000 contacts each on Standard | No, not a list-based database |
| Alerts / monitoring | Yes, up to 20 alerts on Standard, unlimited on Professional | Yes, real-time alerts (2-hour delay on free tier) |
| Journalist signal type | Recent tweets and published articles | Historical pitch performance data on active requests |
Which should you choose?
AnewstipQwotedAnewstipQwotedQwotedAnewstipQwotedThe honest way to frame this is proactive versus reactive. Anewstip rewards you for doing the work of finding a journalist who is already covering your topic and pitching them cold, and it charges accordingly for volume: 1,000 pitches a month for $200. Qwoted rewards you for showing up where journalists have already stated what they need, and its pricing reflects a lighter-touch workflow: free to start, $149/month once two pitches a month stops being enough. Neither model is objectively better; they suit different PR operating styles, and a team running a serious media relations program could reasonably use both at once.
Bottom line
Choose Anewstip if your PR program depends on proactive outreach at volume and you want contact data tied to what a journalist is covering right now rather than a static beat listing. Choose Qwoted if you would rather work from a queue of open requests, especially if podcast guest bookings are part of your mix, and you are fine capping monthly pitch volume in exchange for a free or low-cost entry point. If you need both proactive search and API access alongside a marketplace-style inbound channel, budget for Anewstip Professional and keep Qwoted Basic running as a free supplementary feed.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anewstip or Qwoted better for a PR agency running outbound campaigns for multiple clients?
Anewstip is the better fit for outbound, multi-client PR work because its Professional plan supports up to 5 users, unlimited media lists, and 5,000 pitches a month, all searchable by topic and recent journalist activity. Qwoted is built around responding to inbound requests one at a time, which does not scale the same way for agencies running proactive campaigns across several accounts.
Can I use Qwoted for free and still get real media coverage opportunities?
Yes, Qwoted's free Basic tier includes real access to the expert database, daily opportunity emails, and real-time alerts (with a 2-hour delay), not just a signup gate. The limitation is a 2-pitch-per-month cap, so you can identify and respond to opportunities for free, but volume is restricted until you upgrade to Pro at $149/month.
Does Anewstip work for podcast guest booking the way Qwoted does?
No, Anewstip has no podcast-specific booking tooling; it is built for searching journalists and pitching press coverage. Qwoted explicitly supports podcasters posting guest requests alongside traditional journalist source requests, so if podcast placement matters to your media mix, Qwoted covers a workflow Anewstip does not touch.
Which tool has an API for pulling journalist data into a CRM, Anewstip or Qwoted?
Anewstip is the only one of the two with an API, and it is limited to the Professional ($400/month, billed annually) and Partners plans. Qwoted has no API or third-party integrations on any tier, so its workflow stays self-contained within the platform.
Is Qwoted worth it if I already pay for Anewstip?
It can be, since the two tools cover different moments in the PR process. Anewstip is where you go to proactively find and pitch a journalist on your own story angle; Qwoted is where you catch requests journalists have already posted. Running Qwoted's free Basic tier alongside a paid Anewstip plan costs nothing extra and adds a second, reactive source of opportunities.
How does Anewstip's pitch pricing compare to Qwoted's at similar budget levels?
At roughly comparable monthly spend, Anewstip gives you far more pitch volume: $200/month for 1,000 pitches versus Qwoted's $149/month for 35. The trade-off is that Anewstip's pitches are self-directed cold outreach you have to source yourself, while Qwoted's lower volume is spent responding to requests journalists have already confirmed they want.