LowFruits vs Wordtracker in 2026: SERP weak-spot scoring vs a proprietary keyword database with an API
LowFruits bulk-fetches live SERPs to flag keywords where low-authority sites already rank. Wordtracker runs on a search database it has built since the late 1990s and is the only one of the two with an API.
LowFruits
Wordtracker- LowFruits scores 8.2/10 overall against Wordtracker's 7.0/10, with LowFruits rated higher on features, value for money, and support.
- Wordtracker is the only one of the two with an API, available on its $54/month Gold plan; LowFruits has no API on any tier, including Pay-As-You-Go.
- Wordtracker returns up to 10,000 keyword results per seed search on every tier, including its cheapest $17/month Bronze plan.
- LowFruits runs on monthly credits that do not roll over, plus a Pay-As-You-Go option from $25 one-time; Wordtracker's tiers do not ration the number of searches you can run.
- LowFruits includes keyword clustering and a Domain Explorer database of 150,000+ recurring weak sites, features Wordtracker does not offer.
- Wordtracker's domain competitor tool and SERP preview are available from its $17/month Bronze tier; LowFruits gates competitor keyword extraction and rank tracking behind its Standard subscription.
- Wordtracker connects to Google Search Console from its Silver tier ($38/month) to overlay real ranking data on keyword research; LowFruits has no Search Console integration.
LowFruits and Wordtracker both call themselves keyword research tools, but the data underneath is genuinely different. LowFruits fetches the live SERP for every keyword you feed it and flags positions held by low-domain-authority sites, which is a direct read on whether a smaller site can actually rank rather than a modeled difficulty score. Wordtracker leans on a proprietary search query database it has maintained since before Google Keyword Planner existed, returning up to 10,000 keyword variations per seed term and pairing that with a domain tool for competitor extraction. LowFruits scores higher overall (8.2 versus 7.0) and adds a Domain Explorer database of recurring weak sites plus keyword clustering that Wordtracker does not have. Wordtracker counters with something LowFruits lacks entirely: an API, available on its $54/month Gold plan, along with unlimited searches per tier rather than a credit allowance that resets monthly.
The tools at a glance
LowFruits
Bulk SERP analysis that finds low-competition keywords by spotting weak spots other tools miss with generic KD scores
LowFruits starts from a specific complaint about keyword difficulty scores: most of them are modeled estimates rather than observations of who is actually ranking. Its answer is to bulk-fetch the SERP for an entire keyword list at once and flag positions held by sites with low domain authority, thin content, or weak title relevance, giving a ground-truth read on whether a keyword is winnable for a smaller site right now.
The Wildcard Keyword Finder pulls long-tail ideas straight from Google Autocomplete by dropping an asterisk into a phrase and capturing every variation Google returns for that pattern, surfacing combinations that seed-based tools tend to miss. Subscription plans add keyword clustering, competitor keyword extraction (30 to 70 lookups a month), a Domain Explorer database of more than 150,000 recurring weak sites, and a rank tracker covering up to 500 keywords on Premium.
LowFruits is owned by AIOSEO, the WordPress SEO plugin company, and targets bloggers, niche site builders, and small agencies rather than enterprise buyers. There is no API and no backlink or site-audit capability, so it functions best as a focused opportunity-discovery layer next to a broader SEO stack, not a replacement for one. Credits reset monthly and do not carry over, though Pay-As-You-Go packs from $25 last a year.
| Feature | Standard $20.75/month (billed yearly) | Premium $62.45/month (billed yearly) | Pay-As-You-Go From $25 one-time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credits per month | 3,000 | 10,000 | Varies by pack |
| Domain Explorer | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| Keyword clustering | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tracked keywords | 100 | 500 | Not included |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Wordtracker
Keyword research tool with proprietary data, 10,000 results per search, and built-in competitor domain analysis
Wordtracker has been running since the late 1990s, and it still leans on the proprietary search query database it built over that time, blended with Google data, rather than relying purely on autocomplete scraping. That history shows up in the numbers: a single seed keyword search returns up to 10,000 results, well beyond what most budget tools return per query.
A companion domain tool lets you paste in a competitor's URL and pull the keywords that domain ranks for in both organic and paid search, available from the entry-level Bronze plan. From Silver upward, a Google Search Console connection overlays your actual ranking data on the research, and Gold adds a documented API for pulling keyword data into custom dashboards or content pipelines, something LowFruits does not offer at any tier.
The trade-off is presentation. The interface has not kept pace visually with newer entrants, and Wordtracker's own pricing page does not clearly spell out every feature difference between tiers, which takes some digging to sort out. Plans run $17 to $54 a month across Bronze, Silver, and Gold, and none of them ration how many searches you can run the way LowFruits' credit system does.
| Feature | Bronze $17/mo | Silver $38/mo | Gold $54/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keyword results per search | Up to 10,000 | Up to 10,000 | Up to 10,000 |
| Domain competitor analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Search Console integration | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rank tracking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | LowFruits | Wordtracker |
|---|---|---|
| Core methodology | Bulk SERP analysis for low-authority ranking positions | Proprietary database plus Google data, seed keyword expansion |
| Results per keyword search | One SERP per credit, no fixed cap | Up to 10,000 per search |
| SERP weak-spot / low-authority detection | Yes (core feature) | No (uses SERP preview, not weak-spot scoring) |
| Keyword clustering | Yes | No |
| Domain competitor keyword extraction | Yes (30-70/month, subscription only) | Yes (included on every tier) |
| Rank tracking | Yes (100-500 keywords, subscription only) | Silver tier and above |
| Search Console integration | No | Silver tier and above |
| API access | No | Gold tier only ($54/mo) |
| Usage model | Monthly credits (no rollover) or Pay-As-You-Go | Unlimited searches per tier |
| Overall score | 8.2/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Starting price | $20.75/mo (billed yearly) | $17/mo |
Which should you choose?
LowFruitsWordtrackerLowFruitsWordtrackerWordtrackerLowFruitsLowFruitsThe two tools are built on different bets about what makes keyword research trustworthy. LowFruits bets on live SERP observation: fetch the actual results, look at who is weak, and score from there. Wordtracker bets on data depth accumulated over two and a half decades, returning far more results per search and backing it with an API that LowFruits simply does not have. LowFruits comes out ahead on overall score and on features built specifically for opportunity-hunting, like clustering and the Domain Explorer database. Wordtracker comes out ahead on raw result volume, unrationed usage, and being the only one you can wire into another system programmatically.
Bottom line
Pick LowFruits if your job is finding which keywords a lower-authority site can rank for today, and you want clustering and a weak-site database bundled into a subscription starting at $20.75 a month. Pick Wordtracker if you want 10,000 results per search with no credit ceiling, or if an API matters enough that you're willing to pay for the $54/month Gold plan to get it. Teams doing heavy competitor domain analysis on a tight budget should note Wordtracker includes that feature from its cheapest $17 tier, while LowFruits caps competitor extraction at 30 lookups a month even on Standard.
Frequently asked questions
Is LowFruits or Wordtracker better for finding low-competition keywords for a new site?
LowFruits is built specifically for this: its bulk SERP analysis flags positions held by low-authority sites directly, rather than relying on a modeled difficulty score. Wordtracker's SERP preview shows you the current results but doesn't score them for weak-spot competition the way LowFruits does, so for pure opportunity-hunting LowFruits is the sharper tool.
Does Wordtracker or LowFruits have an API?
Wordtracker does, on its $54/month Gold plan, letting developers pull keyword data programmatically into dashboards or automated pipelines. LowFruits has no API at any tier, including Pay-As-You-Go, so integrating its data into another system means exporting manually.
How many keyword results do you get per search in each tool?
Wordtracker returns up to 10,000 results per seed keyword search on every tier, including the $17/month Bronze plan. LowFruits doesn't cap results per search the same way; usage is instead metered by credits, where each SERP analyzed consumes one credit from your monthly allowance.
Which tool has cheaper competitor keyword research?
Wordtracker includes its domain competitor tool on every plan starting at $17/month with no stated monthly limit on lookups. LowFruits gates competitor keyword extraction behind its Standard subscription at $20.75/month and caps it at 30 extractions a month, rising to 70 on Premium.
Does LowFruits or Wordtracker roll over unused credits or searches?
LowFruits credits do not roll over on subscription plans and reset each billing period, though its Pay-As-You-Go packs are valid for one year from purchase. Wordtracker doesn't use a credit system at all on its subscription tiers, so there's nothing to roll over; you get up to 10,000 results per search for as many searches as you run within your plan.
Is either tool a good fit for backlink or site audit work?
Neither is. LowFruits and Wordtracker are both narrowly focused on keyword discovery and, in Wordtracker's case, competitor keyword extraction and rank tracking. Neither offers backlink analysis or a technical site audit, so teams needing that will need to pair either tool with something like Ahrefs or Semrush.