Comparison

Featured vs Source of Sources in 2026: AI PR co-pilot vs free HARO successor

One is a paid AI chat platform that matches you to journalist requests, podcasts, and AI search visibility. The other is a free email digest run by the person who built HARO in the first place.

Updated July 3, 2026
Featured
Source of Sources
Key takeaways
  • Featured bundles journalist requests, podcast discovery, speaking opportunities, and GEO visibility into one AI chat interface. Source of Sources delivers raw journalist queries by email with no filtering or matching.
  • Source of Sources is completely free with no paid tier at all, while Featured's free plan caps daily AI usage and reserves automated workflows and multi-channel alerts for the $29/mo Lite plan and above.
  • Featured includes GEO Visibility tracking, for how a brand appears in AI-generated search responses, on every plan including the free tier. Source of Sources has no AI search visibility feature at all.
  • Source of Sources sends up to three unfiltered digests a day covering every topic. Featured's AI chat lets you prompt for your specific niche and only surfaces matching requests, podcasts, and events.
  • Neither platform offers a public API. Featured has ruled it out as of mid-2026, and Source of Sources was never built with software integration in mind.
  • Source of Sources is run almost as a side project by its founder, who asks beneficiaries to donate to animal charities rather than pay him. Featured is a funded SaaS company with a published pricing page and support team.

Featured and Source of Sources solve the same root problem, getting your name in front of journalists, from opposite ends of the spend spectrum. Featured is a $0-to-$79-per-month AI chat platform that aggregates journalist requests, podcast opportunities, bylined article slots, speaking events, and GEO visibility tracking into one interface with automated workflows running in the background. Source of Sources is Peter Shankman's free rebuild of the HARO he originally founded and later sold to Cision: a plain-text email digest, up to three times a day, with no dashboard, no filtering, and no cost. If you want software that actively matches, drafts, and alerts you, Featured is built for that. If you want the rawest version of the query-to-inbox pipeline with nothing to subscribe to, Source of Sources still does what the original HARO did before it was commercialized.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Featured$0/moSolo founders, consultants, and small PR or content teams who want AI-matched journalist requests, podcast opportunities, and GEO visibility tracking bundled into one self-serve tool with transparent pricing.
Source of Sources$0Emerging experts, small businesses, and PR consultants who want a zero-cost supplementary channel for journalist queries and are comfortable scanning an unfiltered daily digest themselves.

Source of Sources

Free daily email digest connecting journalists with expert sources, from the founder of HARO

Full review →
Source of Sources screenshot

Source of Sources (SOS) is a free journalist-to-source matching service run by Peter Shankman, who originally founded Help a Reporter Out (HARO) in 2008. HARO became the dominant platform in this space before Cision acquired it and eventually shut down the version Shankman built. SOS is his attempt to recreate what made HARO useful before it was commercialized, minus the platform layer.

The mechanics are deliberately minimal. Journalists submit queries looking for expert sources through a form on the SOS site, Shankman reviews and compiles them, and subscribers get up to three email digests a day listing what each journalist needs and how to respond. There is no login, no dashboard, and no software sitting between you and the journalist: you reply straight from the email and the relationship is yours from first contact.

What keeps SOS usable at zero cost is a strict no-spam rule: pitch a journalist off-topic and Shankman removes you from the list with no appeals. That enforcement is also the platform's ceiling. There is no topic filtering, no search, no analytics on what you have sent or received, and no way to know in advance how much query volume matches your niche in a given week.

Pricing
Feature
Free
$0
Daily journalist query emailsYes
Direct journalist contactYes
Dashboard or search interfaceNo
Topic filteringNo
Analytics or trackingNo
API accessNo
Best for: Emerging experts, small businesses, and PR consultants who want a zero-cost supplementary channel for journalist queries and are comfortable scanning an unfiltered daily digest themselves.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Featured
Source of Sources
Business modelSelf-serve AI chat platformFree email digest run by founder Peter Shankman
Free tierYes (Free plan, capped daily usage)Yes (entire service is free)
Journalist query / request alertsYes (AI-matched via Featured Chat)Yes (raw queries, up to 3x/day via email)
Podcast & event opportunity discoveryYesNo
AI-generated search (GEO) visibility trackingYes (included on every plan)No
Automated opportunity workflowsYes (Limited on Free, full on Lite and Pro)No (fixed digest format, no configuration)
Competitor visibility trackingYesNo
Platform dashboard or appYes (Featured Chat web app)No (email only, no login)
Topic / niche filteringYes (prompt-based)No
API accessNoNo
Multi-channel alerts (Slack, SMS)No on Free, Yes on Lite and ProNo (email only)
Starting price$0/mo$0

Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Featured and Source of Sources?

AI Peekaboo dashboard

Featured's GEO Visibility tracking is a genuine feature included on every plan, but it has no API and no white-label delivery, so agencies cannot pipe that data anywhere or resell it under their own brand. Source of Sources has no AI search visibility feature at all. AI Peekaboo tracks AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and other engines with a read and write API on every plan from $50 per month, plus white-label reports, the layer both of these PR tools are missing if AI answer-engine visibility is the actual goal.

Read the AI Peekaboo review →

Which should you choose?

Solo experts who want AI-matched podcast, article, and speaking opportunities in one placeFeatured
Anyone with zero PR budget who wants journalist queries with no signup frictionSource of Sources
Teams that need GEO or AI search visibility tracking bundled with PR opportunity discoveryFeatured
Freelancers testing whether earned media is worth pursuing before spending anythingSource of Sources
Users who want automated alerts instead of manually scanning a daily emailFeatured
PR consultants managing multiple clients who need separate monitoring contexts per clientFeatured
Extremely early-stage founders who cannot justify even $29 a month yetSource of Sources

These are not really competitors so much as two different eras of the same idea. Source of Sources is the HARO model with the platform stripped back out, kept alive by one person and a strict no-spam rule. Featured took the same journalist-request core and wrapped it in AI matching, podcast and speaking discovery, and GEO visibility, then charged for the parts that require ongoing infrastructure. If your PR need is occasional and your budget is zero, SOS costs you nothing but your own time filtering the digest. If you need consistent, matched opportunities across more than one channel, Featured's free tier already does more than SOS ever will, and the $29 Lite plan is a low bar to clear once volume matters.

Bottom line

Sign up for Source of Sources today, it is free and takes thirty seconds, and use it as a supplementary feed regardless of what else you run. But if earned media is a real priority rather than an occasional bonus, Featured's free tier gives you AI-matched requests, podcasts, and GEO tracking that SOS simply does not have, and the $29/mo Lite plan is worth it the moment you are checking opportunities more than once a week.

Frequently asked questions

Is Source of Sources basically the same thing as HARO?

Source of Sources is a spiritual successor to HARO, not the same product. Peter Shankman founded Help a Reporter Out (HARO) in 2008, sold it to Cision, and launched Source of Sources after Cision wound the original down. It uses the same query-digest mechanic but runs as an independent, unmonetized side project.

Does Featured have a free plan that is actually usable?

Yes, Featured's Free plan includes the full feature set, journalist matching, podcast discovery, and GEO visibility tracking, with a low daily AI usage allowance rather than locked features. It suits someone checking in on two or three opportunities a week; heavier users will hit the cap and need Lite at $29/mo.

Which tool gives better GEO or AI search visibility tracking?

Featured is the only one of the two with any GEO visibility feature. It tracks how your brand and expertise appear in AI-generated search responses across platforms, on all three pricing tiers. Source of Sources has no equivalent capability; it is purely an email query digest.

Can I filter Source of Sources queries by industry or topic?

No, Source of Sources has no filtering, search, or categorization of any kind. Every subscriber receives the identical full digest up to three times a day, so relevance depends entirely on how much of your inbox time you are willing to spend scanning it.

Is Featured worth paying for if Source of Sources is free?

It depends on how much matching and automation you actually need. Source of Sources costs nothing but gives you zero filtering and zero tooling beyond an email inbox. Featured's paid tiers add AI-driven matching, automated workflows with Slack and SMS alerts, and GEO visibility tracking that no free query list offers, which is worth $29/mo once you are actively running a PR or backlink outreach program rather than opportunistically checking email.

Do either of these tools include a journalist contact database for cold pitching?

Neither does. Both platforms work on inbound requests: journalists post what they need and you respond, rather than you searching a database and cold-emailing reporters. If proactive outbound pitching is what you need, look at a dedicated journalist database like Muck Rack or Anewstip instead.

Found this useful? Share it: