The 7 Best Alternatives to AirOps for GEO Agencies in 2026
Seven options for agencies that want analyst-led evidence kept apart from content production
AI Peekaboo fits agencies that deliver scheduled buyer-prompt evidence, preserved answers and exact source URLs, with API and Looker Studio reporting.
Peec AI fits agencies that want daily answer analysis, citation-share views and pooled prompt allocation across agency projects.
Otterly.AI fits small teams that want daily monitoring, exact cited sources and raw exports, with API access starting on Standard.
Writesonic GEO fits agencies that want drafting, site audits and daily tracking in one system for a small client set.
Athena HQ fits agencies serving brand clients that want monitoring plus content recommendations and Shopify or Webflow integrations.
Omnia fits small agencies that want daily monitoring plus an assistant proposing approved content and outreach actions.
Rankscale fits analyst-heavy agencies that want broad engine selection, query fan-out analysis and white-label links on higher tiers.
AI Peekaboo is the first AirOps alternative to test when your agency wants buyer-question evidence kept apart from content production. This guide covers AI visibility and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows only. AirOps joins insights with content workflows, CMS publishing and approval steps, and its monitoring can share a task balance with production. If your analysts own the findings and a separate team owns the writing, compare trackers on prompt coverage, preserved answers, exact cited URLs and client reporting. Mentions and citations describe answers. They do not show what caused a recommendation or a sale.
Tools at a glance
About AirOpsContent production workflows connected to AI search insights
Insights combine prompt visibility, citation and competitor analysis
Content workflows, Grids and Brand Kits for writing and refreshing pages
CMS publishing integrations and human approval steps
API and MCP connections
Agent analytics and onsite/offsite opportunities
AI Peekaboo
Buyer-question monitoring with API reporting and evidence-linked actions
A strategist can quote the exact sentence an assistant returned. AI Peekaboo runs your chosen buyer prompts on a schedule and preserves each answer with the exact source URLs returned.
Competitor mentions, sentiment and share of voice sit in the same tracked cohort. Evidence-linked recommendations and Markdown content briefs hand a writer the next action without mixing analysis and production.
Read/write REST API and Looker Studio come with paid subscriptions. Read-only branded client share views and white-label delivery start at a $100 monthly list price, not at the $29 minimum.
| Feature | Configurable monitoring From $29/mo |
|---|---|
| Pricing basis | Brands, prompts, platforms and cadence |
| Team members | Unlimited |
| REST API and Looker Studio | Included on paid subscriptions |
| White-label delivery | From $100/mo |
| Client share links | From $100/mo |
- Preserved answers with exact returned source URLs
- Unlimited team members and no per-seat fees
- API and Looker Studio on paid subscriptions
- Client share links need at least $100 per month
- Cadence is one subscription-wide setting, not per brand
- Copilot is an add-on and Claude costs extra per check
Peec AI
AI search analytics, brand perception and shopping visibility
Start with the analysis question: which source domains and URLs recur for a client's prompts? Peec AI covers daily monitoring, positions, sentiment, share of voice and citation-share analysis.
Agency projects with pooled prompt allocation suit a multi-client book. Recommended actions for owned and earned sources give the account lead a next step to propose.
Brand Starter has 50 prompts, one project and three selected platforms, so it is a single-brand package. Agencies should price an agency package and confirm its features. Shopping scope must match the chosen package.
| Feature | Starter, brands €70/mo billed annually |
|---|---|
| Brand Starter prompts | 50 |
| Included platforms | Choose 3 |
| Brand Starter projects | 1 |
| Agency Essential | €175/mo billed annually |
| Enterprise API | Custom package |
- Daily monitoring with sentiment and share of voice
- Source domain, URL and citation-share analysis
- Agency projects with pooled prompt allocation
- Extra platforms carry separate costs
- Agency feature scope depends on the package chosen
- API requires Enterprise, Looker Studio on Advanced brand plans
Otterly.AI
Daily prompt tracking, citation exports and GEO audits
Otterly.AI is a focused daily measurement tool. It tracks buyer prompts, records exact cited sources and offers CSV and raw-response exports you can reuse in your own client decks.
GEO audits and recommendations add a next step, and ChatGPT ads and shopping tracking are on all plans. Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons.
Lite has 15 prompts and one workspace, so it suits a single pilot, not a client roster. Looker Studio, API and MCP begin on Standard, and agency partner capacities are separate.
| Feature | Lite $29/mo |
|---|---|
| Prompts | 15 |
| Base AI engines | 4 |
| Cadence | Daily |
| API / Looker Studio | Standard from $189/mo |
| Gemini / AI Mode | Paid add-ons |
| Workspaces | 1 on Lite; unlimited from Standard |
- Daily monitoring with exact cited sources
- CSV and raw-response exports
- ChatGPT ads and shopping tracking on all plans
- Lite is limited to one workspace and 15 prompts
- API and Looker Studio start at Standard
- Gemini and AI Mode cost extra
Writesonic GEO
AI search tracking tied to content production and site fixes
Writesonic GEO suits an agency that wants the draft and the diagnosis in one place. It combines daily AI visibility tracking with article generation, website audits and agentic workflows.
Writesonic blends monitoring with production, useful when the same agency team drafts client content. Its daily tracking and website audits can also inform the report, so compare the combined workflow with the service your team delivers.
Starter tracks ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews with one project and one user, billed annually. Sentiment starts on Growth, and all ten platforms are Enterprise.
| Feature | Starter $79/mo billed annually |
|---|---|
| Starter prompts | 50 |
| Included AI platforms | 3 |
| Users / projects | 1 / 1 |
| Sentiment | Growth |
| Billing | Annual |
- Daily tracking plus article generation
- Website audits in the same system
- Agentic content and GEO workflows
- Starter is one project and one user
- Sentiment begins on Growth
- Wider platform coverage and Looker Studio are Enterprise
Athena HQ
AI visibility, content optimization and enterprise claim review
Athena HQ pairs prompt, response and citation monitoring with content recommendations and an optimization agent. Shopify and Webflow integrations help when clients publish on those platforms.
Credits matter for planning: one credit is one AI response, and Starter includes 3,600. Count prompts, platforms and run frequency before promising a client coverage.
API access is a paid add-on on Starter. Multi-region coverage and enterprise access controls depend on the package, and CSV exports cover ad hoc reporting.
| Feature | Starter $295/mo |
|---|---|
| Monthly credits | 3,600 |
| AI platform coverage | 11 listed platforms |
| API access | Paid add-on |
| Enterprise | Custom |
- Prompt, response and citation monitoring
- Shopify and Webflow integrations
- Enterprise claim review and discrepancy detection
- Starter at $295 per month is a higher entry point
- API is a paid add-on
- Credits are consumed per AI response
Omnia
Daily AI visibility with an assistant that proposes and executes work
Omnia puts an assistant, Omnio, on top of daily monitoring. It proposes content, briefs and publishing work, and approval comes before publishing, which keeps a human in the loop.
Citation gaps, sentiment and competitor share of voice give the evidence behind each proposed action. Third-party outreach and CMS integration extend into execution.
Growth has 25 monitored prompts and a separate insight credit balance. Four engines run by default, up to seven can be unlocked, and API, exports and delivery scope vary by package.
| Feature | Growth €79/mo |
|---|---|
| Prompts | 25 |
| Insight credits | 150 |
| Baseline cadence | Daily |
| Engine selection | 4 default, up to 7 |
- Daily prompt monitoring and citation gaps
- Approval before publishing work
- Sentiment and competitor share of voice
- Growth covers only 25 prompts
- Insight work draws on a separate credit balance
- API and export scope varies by package
Rankscale
Credit-based AI visibility across interfaces, models and shopping
Rankscale is built for analysts who care about engine choice. It monitors consumer interfaces and API engines, with citations, source-box and competitor analysis and query fan-out analysis.
Credits drive cost, and engine choice changes consumption, so model a client's prompt list before quoting. Shopping and advertising analysis are available on eligible packages.
Essentials is annual only, with 120 credits, two dashboards, and no exports or sentiment. REST API begins at Pro+ and white-label dashboard links at Growth.
| Feature | Essentials, annual only €17/mo billed annually |
|---|---|
| Essentials billing | Annual only |
| Essentials credits | 120/mo |
| REST API | Pro+ from €229/mo |
| White-label links | Growth from €385/mo |
- Consumer interface and API engine monitoring
- Query fan-out and page audit analysis
- MCP, Looker Studio and REST API by tier
- Essentials has no exports or sentiment
- REST API starts at Pro+
- White-label links start at Growth
Which AirOps alternative should a GEO agency pick?
AI PeekabooPeec AIOtterly.AIWritesonic GEOAthena HQOmniaRankscaleStart with AI Peekaboo for an analyst-led service built on scheduled buyer questions, preserved answers, exact returned URLs and reusable reporting. Peec AI suits multi-client source analysis, Rankscale offers engine flexibility, and Otterly.AI adds daily tracking with unlimited workspaces from Standard. Writesonic GEO, Athena HQ and Omnia combine monitoring with content actions in different ways; compare those workflows when they support your client service. AirOps remains relevant for Insights and production together. Choose around the tasks your team owns, and report answers and citations separately from any evidence of commercial impact.
Frequently asked questions
Is AI Peekaboo a good AirOps alternative for a GEO agency that separates analysis from writing?
AI Peekaboo fits an agency that separates analysis from writing. It tracks buyer prompts on a schedule, preserves answers and exact source URLs, and produces Markdown content briefs. Your analyst can give a writer a defined assignment while keeping client reporting tied to the recorded answers.
Can AirOps and AI Peekaboo be used together on a client engagement?
AirOps and AI Peekaboo can serve different parts of the same agency workflow. AirOps covers content production, CMS publishing and approvals, while Peekaboo supplies scheduled buyer-question records and briefs. Assign a reporting owner so the client receives consistent findings rather than competing sets of figures.
What should a GEO agency compare when replacing AirOps monitoring with a dedicated tracker?
Compare prompt limits, platforms, cadence, preserved answers, exact cited URLs and client reporting. AirOps monitoring can share a task balance with production, so check how each alternative counts usage before you quote a client.
Does AI Peekaboo support white-label client reporting for agencies replacing AirOps?
Read-only branded client share views and white-label delivery start at a $100 monthly list price. The $29 minimum does not include them. API and Looker Studio come with paid subscriptions for building your own reports.
Which AirOps alternative suits an agency managing many client projects?
Peec AI offers agency projects with pooled prompt allocation, and Rankscale offers white-label links from Growth. Otterly.AI Lite has one workspace, so it suits one pilot client. Confirm the agency package features before quoting.
Can citation data from an AirOps alternative prove a client's sales rose?
Citation data cannot prove that on its own. Mentions and cited URLs show what answers contained. Linking them to revenue needs separate analytics, and any recommendation should be framed as a test, not a promised result.
Reviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEOVast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
Checked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.