AirOps vs Quattr in 2026: free-tier AEO content creation vs GIGA AI agent for unified SEO, AEO, and GEO
AirOps pairs content creation with citation tracking across four AI platforms, starting with a genuinely free Solo plan. Quattr unifies SEO, AEO, and GEO under its GIGA AI agent and automated internal linking, sold exclusively through a demo.
AirOps
Quattr- AirOps offers a genuinely functional free Solo plan with real AI search tracking across four platforms. Quattr has no free tier and no self-serve trial; every engagement starts with a demo.
- Quattr tracks six AI surfaces, including Claude, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. AirOps tracks four: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI answers, with no Claude coverage.
- Quattr's internal linking AI builds a site-wide link structure automatically using vector embeddings of every page. AirOps has no equivalent internal linking feature.
- AirOps includes offsite content management, tracking and optimizing content published on third-party pages like guest posts and partner sites. This is not a documented Quattr feature.
- AirOps publishes pricing: free Solo, $199/month Pro, and custom Enterprise. Quattr shows no public pricing at all, only "Contact for pricing" behind a required demo.
- Quattr is rated 4.9/5 on G2 across 65 verified reviews and lists customers including Simpplr, Men's Wearhouse, and Housing.com. AirOps does not publish a G2 rating in its own material.
- Neither tool offers white-label delivery on a standard plan: AirOps does not offer it at all, and Quattr does not clearly publish white-label availability outside a custom Enterprise contract.
AirOps and Quattr both sell "content plus AI visibility in one platform," but they start from different ends of the workflow and different ends of the market. AirOps is built around a tight loop: identify the prompts your audience is asking, use configurable AI agents to create or refresh content aimed at those prompts, then track whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI answers actually cite you, all inside one product with a free Solo tier to test before paying $199 a month for Pro. Quattr goes broader: its GIGA AI agent runs research, drafting, optimization, and publishing across Google, AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini at once, and its internal linking engine builds a site-wide link structure from vector embeddings automatically, but none of it has a public price and every deal starts with a demo. The real question is whether a team wants to self-serve into a leaner content-and-tracking loop, or commit to an enterprise sales process for a wider, more automated platform.
The tools at a glance
AirOps
AI-powered content creation and AEO optimization with citation tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini
AirOps combines two jobs most teams currently split across separate tools: creating content aimed at AI search, and tracking whether that content actually earns citations in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI answers. The workflow runs in a loop: identify the prompts your category is being asked, use configurable AI agents to produce or refresh content built for those formats, direct answers, structured comparisons, FAQ pages, then watch whether visibility moves. Content refresh automation closes that loop by triggering an update workflow automatically when a page starts losing visibility.
The offsite content management feature is a genuine differentiator: AirOps tracks and helps optimize content published on third-party platforms, guest posts, partner pages, G2 profiles, on the logic that AI models frequently cite pages other than your homepage. Competitor intelligence rounds this out by showing which prompts are surfacing competitors and what content is earning those citations, so a team can move from gap identification straight into production.
What makes AirOps unusual in this category is a genuinely free Solo plan with real citation tracking, not a time-limited trial. The jump to Pro at $199 a month unlocks full content agents, offsite content management, refresh automation, and API access, which is a real budget commitment, but a team can validate whether AI search is worth investing in before paying anything. There is no white-label delivery on any tier, which limits its fit for agencies managing multiple client brands.
| Feature | Solo Free | Pro $199/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Content creation agents | Limited | Full | Full |
| Offsite content management | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content refresh automation | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Quattr
Unified SEO, AEO, and GEO platform powered by AI agent GIGA for ranking in Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Mode
Quattr unifies traditional search optimization with Answer Engine Optimization and Generative Engine Optimization in a single workflow, coordinated by an AI agent called GIGA. GIGA surfaces content opportunities across Google, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini simultaneously, then drafts content in brand voice and optimizes it against competitive benchmarks and predictive scoring before it publishes. Teams report optimizing roughly 4x more pages per month compared to manual workflows.
The internal linking engine is Quattr's clearest technical edge over a tool like AirOps. It crawls a full site, builds vector embeddings of every page, and constructs an optimal internal link structure automatically, updating it as new content publishes. That's a content-architecture problem AirOps doesn't address at all, and for a large content operation where topical authority is a strategic priority, automating it removes what's normally a manual, ongoing audit.
Quattr is sold exclusively through a demo-led process, with no published pricing and no self-serve trial, though a free trial is included once you've booked the demo. Customers include Simpplr, Men's Wearhouse, and Housing.com, and G2 reviewers rate the platform 4.9/5 across 65 reviews, with particular praise for how GIGA closes the gap between data and execution. For a team with the organizational capacity to act on cross-surface recommendations and the patience for an enterprise sales cycle, the depth is real; for a team that wants to sign up today, it isn't an option.
| Feature | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|
| Demo required | ✓ |
| GIGA AI agent | ✓ |
| SEO, AEO, and GEO unified | ✓ |
| Internal linking AI | ✓ |
| Predictive content scoring | ✓ |
| AI engines tracked | 6+ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | AirOps | Quattr |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 4 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI answers) | 6+ (Google, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) |
| Content creation agent | Yes, limited on Solo, full on Pro+ | Yes (GIGA agent, research through publishing) |
| Content refresh automation | Yes, Pro tier and above | Not a documented standalone feature |
| Offsite content management | Yes | Not documented |
| Internal linking automation | No | Yes |
| Predictive content scoring | No | Yes |
| Competitor intelligence | Yes, basic on Solo, full on Pro+ | Yes, as part of unified strategy discovery |
| API access | Pro tier and above | Yes, tier scope not published |
| White-label delivery | No | Not clearly published |
| Free tier / self-serve signup | Yes, free Solo plan | No, demo required |
| Starting price | Free | Contact for pricing |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside AirOps and Quattr?
AirOps and Quattr both fold AI visibility tracking into a larger content platform rather than treating it as the core product: AirOps caps tracking at four engines and gates API access behind its $199/month Pro tier, while Quattr's broader six-engine coverage sits behind a demo-only sales process with no public pricing. AI Peekaboo ships a read and write API on every plan from $50 per month, tracks five named AI surfaces including Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, and includes white-label delivery on every tier, something neither AirOps nor Quattr documents. For agencies or in-house teams whose priority is AI visibility tracking specifically, with API access and client-ready delivery from day one, it's worth comparing against either platform.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
AirOpsAirOpsQuattrQuattrQuattrAirOpsQuattrAirOps and Quattr are both "content plus AI visibility" platforms, but they're built for different scales of operation. AirOps is a tight, self-serve loop: create content with AI agents, track four engines, refresh what's losing visibility, and it starts free. Quattr is a broader, enterprise-grade system where one AI agent handles research through publishing across six-plus engines and automatically maintains a site's internal linking structure, sold through a sales process with no public price. A team choosing between them is really choosing between validating an AEO investment cheaply first, or committing directly to a wider, more automated platform.
Bottom line
Choose AirOps if you want to test whether AI search visibility matters for your category without committing budget upfront, and you're fine with four tracked engines and no white-label option. Choose Quattr if you need SEO, AEO, and GEO strategy unified under one AI agent with automated internal linking and six-plus engine coverage including Claude, and you can commit to a demo-led enterprise buying process. For teams that want affordable, self-serve AI visibility tracking with a documented API and white-label delivery before committing to either, AI Peekaboo is worth a look at $50/month.
Frequently asked questions
Is the AirOps free plan actually useful, or is it just a limited trial like Quattr's demo access?
The AirOps Solo plan includes real AI search tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google, not a time-limited trial, though content creation features are capped. Quattr has no self-serve free plan at all; it offers a free trial only after booking a demo, which is a fundamentally different evaluation path.
Does AirOps track Claude the way Quattr does?
No. AirOps currently tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI answers, with no Claude coverage. Quattr tracks Claude alongside Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, giving it six-plus engines versus AirOps's four.
Which tool automates internal linking, AirOps or Quattr?
Quattr is the one with this feature. Its internal linking AI crawls a full site, builds vector embeddings of every page, and constructs an optimal link structure automatically, updating as new content publishes. AirOps has no equivalent internal linking automation; its automation is focused on content refresh cycles rather than site architecture.
Is Quattr worth the demo-led sales process for a mid-size content team in 2026?
Quattr is worth the process if a team genuinely needs SEO, AEO, and GEO unified under one AI agent with automated internal linking at scale; customers cited include Simpplr, Men's Wearhouse, and Housing.com, and it holds a 4.9/5 rating on G2 across 65 reviews. A smaller team that just wants to validate AEO cheaply first will get there faster with AirOps's free Solo plan.
Can agencies use AirOps or Quattr to manage AEO for multiple client brands with white-label reporting?
Neither tool is a strong fit for this specifically. AirOps does not offer white-label delivery or guest access links on any tier, and Quattr does not clearly publish white-label availability outside a custom Enterprise contract. Agencies prioritizing white-label AEO reporting across multiple clients may find AI Peekaboo, which includes it from $50/month, a more direct fit than either.
What does offsite content management in AirOps cover that Quattr doesn't?
AirOps tracks and helps optimize content published on third-party platforms, guest posts, partner pages, and profiles like G2, on the logic that AI models frequently cite pages other than a brand's own homepage. This is not a documented feature in Quattr's published feature set, which focuses on a brand's own site and content pipeline.