Comparison

Aiso vs Athena HQ in 2026: prompt discovery from real conversations vs free GEO audit with content gap analysis

Two AI visibility tools built for the early stage of a Generative Engine Optimization program. Aiso discovers prompts from real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations. Athena HQ runs a structured GEO audit with content gap analysis tied to AI citations.

Updated July 2, 2026
Aiso
Athena HQ
Key takeaways
  • Aiso Starter is $79/month with three engines and prompt discovery. Athena HQ Essential is free with four engines and basic content gap analysis; the paid Starter tier is $295/month.
  • Aiso includes the Conversation Explorer, which analyzes real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface the prompts actual users are asking in your category. Athena HQ runs a structured GEO audit with content gap analysis tied to AI citation patterns.
  • Aiso covers three engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity). Athena HQ covers four engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity) including Claude, which Aiso does not track.
  • For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) programs starting from scratch with no prompt list, Aiso is the discovery tool. For teams that already know what to track and want audit depth, Athena HQ is the audit tool.
  • Aiso uses a three-state scoring model (Mentioned, Recommended, Absent). Athena HQ uses a content gap matrix tied to competitor citation patterns to surface what to write next.
  • Both tools reserve API access for paid plans: Aiso Starter and Growth are dashboard-only with API on Enterprise, while Athena HQ unlocks API at $295/month on Starter.
  • Aiso includes fan-out tracking that surfaces secondary prompts users ask after an initial query. Athena HQ focuses on content gap analysis tied to citations rather than conversation fan-out.

If you are evaluating AI visibility tools in 2026 and want to understand how does Aiso compare to Athena HQ for prompt discovery and content gap analysis, the difference is in what each platform generates from AI data. Aiso starts at $79/month and analyzes real conversations in ChatGPT and Gemini through its Conversation Explorer, surfacing the prompts actual users are asking in your category plus a three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring model. Athena HQ offers a free Essential tier that runs a real GEO audit across four engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity) with content gap analysis tied directly to AI citation patterns, then jumps to $295/month on Starter for API access and full citation source tracking. The right pick depends on whether you want a paid prompt discovery platform or a free GEO audit with structured content recommendations.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Aiso$79/monthBrand managers and in-house marketers in the discovery phase of AI visibility monitoring who need help finding which prompts matter before committing to a monitoring program.
Athena HQFreeIn-house content and SEO teams who want to start with a free GEO audit and scale into a structured Generative Engine Optimization improvement program with content gap analysis.

Aiso

AI search optimization using real ChatGPT and Gemini conversation analysis

Full review →
Aiso screenshot

Aiso is an AI search optimization platform that analyzes real conversations happening in ChatGPT and Gemini to track brand visibility and identify optimization opportunities. Rather than requiring you to define a prompt set and then monitoring those prompts, Aiso's Conversation Explorer discovers what real users are asking AI models about your category, which prompts are relevant to your brand, and where you currently appear or are absent.

The platform tracks three AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity) and provides visibility scoring at three levels: whether your brand is Mentioned, Recommended, or Absent in AI-generated answers. This three-state model is more useful than a binary cited or not cited metric because being mentioned and being recommended represent meaningfully different brand outcomes.

Aiso targets marketing teams and brand managers who are early in their AI visibility journey and are not yet sure which prompts matter for their category. The Conversation Explorer and GPT Trends features are genuinely useful for that discovery phase, though the platform has less to offer once you have established a clear monitoring program and need API integration or broader model coverage. For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) work that starts with prompt discovery rather than content gap analysis, Aiso is a strong fit.

Pricing
Feature
Starter
$79/month
Growth
$239/month
Enterprise
Custom pricing
AI models tracked333
Conversation Explorer
Competitor benchmarking
API access
White-label delivery
Best for: Brand managers and in-house marketers in the discovery phase of AI visibility monitoring who need help finding which prompts matter before committing to a monitoring program.

Athena HQ

Free-to-start GEO audit platform with citation gap analysis and API access on paid plans

Full review →
Athena HQ screenshot

Athena HQ is a generative engine optimization platform that tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Its core differentiator is the GEO audit: a structured analysis that identifies not just whether your brand is cited, but which content gaps are preventing better citation rates.

The free Essential plan stands out in a category where most tools require a paid subscription before you can see meaningful data. With the free tier, you can run a baseline audit, see where your brand currently appears across the four AI models, and identify the content topics your site is not covering that AI models appear to draw from when citing competitors.

The paid Starter plan at $295/month is a significant step up, but it unlocks API access, citation source tracking, and deeper content gap analysis. This positions Athena HQ as a tool for teams who want to move from basic monitoring into an active Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) improvement program, where content recommendations feed directly into a content calendar and progress is tracked over time.

Pricing
Feature
Essential
Free
Starter
$295/mo
Enterprise
Contact
AI models tracked444
GEO audit
Content gap analysisBasicFullFull
Citation source tracking
Competitor benchmarking2UnlimitedUnlimited
API access
White label
Best for: In-house content and SEO teams who want to start with a free GEO audit and scale into a structured Generative Engine Optimization improvement program with content gap analysis.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Aiso
Athena HQ
AI engines trackedChatGPT, Gemini, PerplexityChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity
Competitive share-of-voiceYesYes (2 on free, unlimited on paid)
Prompt-level citation dataYes (Conversation Explorer)Yes
Answer / content gap analysisPartial (via fan-out)Yes (tied to AI citations)
Category intelligenceYes (real user prompts)Limited
AEO content generationNoNo
Crawler / AI bot log accessNoNo
Page content auditsNoNo
API accessEnterprise onlyYes (Starter $295/mo)
Looker Studio / BI connectorNoNo
White-label deliveryNoNo
Pay-per-prompt pricingNoNo
Agency multi-brand supportNoNo
Starting price$79/moFree (Essential)

Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Aiso and Athena HQ?

AI Peekaboo dashboard

Neither Aiso nor Athena HQ includes white-label delivery on any tier, which limits both tools for agencies delivering branded client reports. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool with white-label client reports and guest access links on every plan from $50/month Starter, alongside read and write API. For SEO and marketing agencies that need to deliver visibility reports to clients without giving them a separate login, AI Peekaboo is the right alternative.

Read the AI Peekaboo review →

Which should you choose?

Teams in the discovery phase needing help finding which prompts to trackAiso
Teams wanting to start a Generative Engine Optimization program at zero costAthena HQ
Teams wanting structured content gap analysis tied to AI citationsAthena HQ
Teams wanting the Conversation Explorer for prompt discovery from real usersAiso
Teams needing Claude coverage for AI visibility monitoringAthena HQ
Teams wanting fan-out tracking of follow-up AI conversationsAiso
Teams wanting a three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring modelAiso

Aiso and Athena HQ serve different stages of an AI visibility program. Aiso is the discovery tool: it analyzes real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations through the Conversation Explorer, surfacing prompts you did not know to track, with a three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring model. Athena HQ is the audit tool: it runs a structured GEO audit across four engines and surfaces content gaps tied to AI citation patterns, with the free Essential tier offering meaningful data and the $295/month Starter adding API and full citation source tracking. For teams that do not yet know what to track, Aiso is the better starting point. For teams that want audit depth and structured content recommendations, Athena HQ is the deeper tool.

Bottom line

Aiso is the pick when you need prompt discovery from real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations and a three-state scoring model at $79/month with no free tier. Athena HQ is the pick when you want a free GEO audit with content gap analysis tied to AI citations, plus API access at $295/month on Starter. For prompt discovery in the early stage of Generative Engine Optimization work, Aiso wins. For free audit entry with structured content recommendations, Athena HQ is the better fit.

Frequently asked questions

How does Aiso compare to Athena HQ for engine coverage?

Aiso tracks three engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. Athena HQ tracks four engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Athena HQ covers Claude, which Aiso does not. Neither covers Google AI Overviews, Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot, or Meta AI.

Which tool is better for prompt discovery in a Generative Engine Optimization program?

Aiso is the better choice for prompt discovery. The Conversation Explorer analyzes real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface the prompts actual users are asking in your category. Athena HQ assumes you already have a prompt set and runs the audit on those prompts.

Which tool has a better free tier for Generative Engine Optimization monitoring?

Athena HQ has the more structured free tier: it runs a real GEO audit across four engines with basic content gap analysis at zero cost. Aiso does not offer a free tier; the Starter plan is $79/month.

Does Aiso or Athena HQ offer content gap analysis?

Athena HQ offers content gap analysis tied directly to AI citation patterns. The free tier includes basic content gap analysis, and the $295/month Starter plan includes full content gap analysis plus citation source tracking. Aiso surfaces gaps through fan-out tracking rather than a dedicated content gap matrix.

What is fan-out tracking in Aiso?

Fan-out tracking in Aiso surfaces secondary prompts users ask after an initial query, showing how AI conversations evolve and where your brand can appear at multiple points in a user's AI conversation journey. Athena HQ does not currently offer fan-out tracking.

Is Aiso worth the cost compared to Athena HQ?

Aiso at $79/month is worth the cost if you specifically need prompt discovery, fan-out tracking, and the three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring model. Athena HQ is worth the cost if you want a free GEO audit with content gap analysis and are willing to pay $295/month for API access on Starter. The right choice depends on whether you want prompt research depth or audit depth at zero cost.

Found this useful? Share it: