Aiso vs Riff Analytics in 2026: Conversation discovery vs 7-engine monitoring with AI readiness audit
Two AI visibility platforms at similar price points but different feature focuses. Aiso leads with conversation analysis and three-state scoring at $79/month. Riff Analytics leads with 7-engine coverage including Grok and DeepSeek from $49/month.
Aiso
Riff Analytics- Aiso starts at $79/month for three-engine tracking with a Conversation Explorer. Riff Analytics starts at $49/month for Starter covering 7 AI engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama.
- Riff Analytics tracks 7 AI engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama alongside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini. Aiso covers three engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity.
- Riff Analytics includes citation source tracking showing which URLs AI engines cite when mentioning your brand. Aiso focuses on prompt discovery and three-state scoring rather than citation source identification.
- Aiso reserves API access for Enterprise tier only. Riff Analytics does not offer API access on any plan, so neither tool exposes programmatic data access at transparent pricing.
- Riff Analytics includes an AI readiness audit that checks site structure and entity signals before monitoring begins. Aiso does not include an equivalent readiness layer.
- For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams in the discovery phase needing conversation-led prompt research, Aiso is the more purposeful fit at $79/month. For teams wanting 7-engine coverage with citation tracking and AI readiness audit at $49/month, Riff Analytics is the more accessible choice.
If you are weighing AI visibility tools at the entry tier, Aiso and Riff Analytics both fit mid-budget in-house teams but solve different parts of the GEO workflow. Aiso uses a Conversation Explorer to surface real ChatGPT and Gemini prompts, tracks three engines with three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring at $79/month. Riff Analytics tracks 7 AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama) with citation source tracking and an AI readiness audit, starting at $49/month for Starter. How does Aiso compare to Riff Analytics for teams weighing conversation-led discovery against broader engine coverage with citation intelligence? Both serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) programmes, but Aiso focuses on discovery while Riff Analytics focuses on broader engine coverage with citation source data. The right pick depends on whether discovery depth or engine breadth with citation tracking is your bigger gap.
The tools at a glance
Aiso
AI search optimization using real ChatGPT and Gemini conversation analysis
Aiso is an AI search optimization platform that focuses on prompt discovery. Its Conversation Explorer analyzes real conversations happening in ChatGPT and Gemini to surface the prompts actual users are asking in your category. For teams entering Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the first time, this removes a significant amount of upfront prompt engineering work and grounds the monitoring programme in real usage data.
The platform tracks three AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity) and uses a three-state scoring model: Mentioned, Recommended, or Absent. This scoring is more informative than a binary cited or not cited metric, since being mentioned in a long list of alternatives and being actively recommended as a solution represent meaningfully different brand outcomes. Aiso also tracks fan-out patterns: the secondary prompts users ask after an initial query.
The trade-off versus Riff Analytics is engine count and citation layer. Aiso covers three engines versus Riff Analytics seven, has no API access on Starter or Growth, and offers no citation source tracking. For teams that need conversation-led prompt discovery first, Aiso is the right starting point at $79/month.
| Feature | Starter $79/month | Growth $239/month | Enterprise Custom pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Conversation Explorer | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fan-out tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Riff Analytics
AI brand visibility tracking across 7 LLM engines with citation source analysis, sentiment monitoring, and competitor benchmarking
Riff Analytics is an AI brand visibility monitoring platform that tracks where your brand is mentioned across seven major AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. Unlike tools that focus on a narrower set of models, Riff Analytics casts a wide net, which is useful for brands that want visibility across the full landscape of AI assistants rather than just the top two or three.
The platform monitors not just whether your brand appears in AI answers, but which sources those AI engines are citing when they mention you. This citation source tracking tells you whether AI engines are pulling from your own content, third-party reviews, press coverage, or competitor domains, which informs where to invest in content and PR to improve AI visibility over time.
The trade-off versus Aiso is the discovery layer. Riff Analytics assumes you already know your prompt set; it does not analyze real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface prompts the way Aiso's Conversation Explorer does. For teams wanting 7-engine coverage with citation tracking and an AI readiness audit at $49/month, Riff Analytics is the more accessible choice. For pure discovery, Aiso at $79/month is the lower-friction fit.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Pro $199/mo |
|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 7 | 7 |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI readiness audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Looker Studio connector | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Aiso | Riff Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity | 7 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama) |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes (Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring) | Yes (citation source tracking) |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Partial (via fan-out tracking) | Partial |
| Category intelligence | Yes (GPT Trends) | Partial |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | Partial (AI readiness audit) |
| API access | Enterprise plan only | No |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No native connector | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No (seat-based plans) | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | No |
| Starting price | $79/mo | $49/mo |
Need API and white-label that Aiso and Riff Analytics do not offer?
Aiso locks API access to its Enterprise tier, and Riff Analytics has no API or white-label on any plan. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility monitoring tool for agencies that need read and write API plus white-label from $50/month, with self-serve signup and 5 AI surfaces. For marketing teams that need to deliver branded client reports with programmatic data access, AI Peekaboo is the affordable AEO alternative.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
AisoRiff AnalyticsAisoRiff AnalyticsAisoRiff AnalyticsAisoBoth tools are credible AI visibility platforms with transparent pricing under $100/month, but they sit at different price points and solve different parts of the GEO workflow. Aiso at $79/month helps you discover prompts through conversation analysis with three-state scoring. Riff Analytics at $49/month helps you monitor 7 engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama with citation source tracking and an AI readiness audit. The choice is essentially discovery-versus-coverage-with-citation-intelligence as your bigger gap.
Bottom line
If your priority is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) prompt discovery grounded in real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations with three-state scoring, Aiso at $79/month is the more purposeful fit. If your priority is the broadest entry-tier engine coverage with citation source tracking and AI readiness audit, Riff Analytics at $49/month is the more accessible choice. Pick the platform that matches your team's maturity stage and discovery-versus-coverage trade-off.
Frequently asked questions
How does Aiso compare to Riff Analytics for AI visibility monitoring?
Aiso at $79/month is a prompt discovery platform with three-engine coverage, three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring, and a Conversation Explorer that surfaces real ChatGPT and Gemini prompts. Riff Analytics at $49/month tracks 7 engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama with citation source tracking and an AI readiness audit. Aiso fits the discovery phase; Riff Analytics fits teams wanting broader coverage with citation intelligence at the entry tier.
Is Riff Analytics worth the cost at $49/month for 7-engine coverage?
For in-house teams that want to track brand presence across a diverse set of AI engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama without spending $100+/month, Riff Analytics at $49/month is genuinely accessible. The trade-off is no API access and the Pro plan at $199/month is a significant step up without clear tier differentiation. For teams that just need prompt discovery without broader coverage, Aiso at $79/month covers the use case.
How much does Aiso cost compared to Riff Analytics?
Aiso starts at $79/month on Starter, $239/month on Growth, and Custom on Enterprise. Riff Analytics starts at $49/month on Starter and $199/month on Pro. Riff Analytics is $30/month cheaper at the entry tier and covers more than twice the engines. The right pick depends on whether prompt discovery depth (Aiso) or broader engine coverage with citation tracking (Riff Analytics) is the priority.
Which tool has better prompt discovery for AI visibility?
Aiso is the answer here. Its Conversation Explorer analyzes real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface prompts actual users are asking in your category, removing guesswork from prompt set definition at $79/month. Riff Analytics assumes you already know your prompt set; it does not have an equivalent prompt discovery layer. For teams entering Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the first time, Aiso is the more purposeful fit.
How many AI engines does each tool track?
Aiso tracks three engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) on every plan with three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring. Riff Analytics tracks 7 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama) on every plan. For brands whose audiences use Grok, DeepSeek, or Llama, Riff Analytics is the broader-coverage choice. For teams focused on conversation discovery in the three most common engines, Aiso is sufficient.
Does Riff Analytics have citation source tracking?
Yes. Riff Analytics records which URLs and domains AI engines cite when they mention your brand, showing whether citations come from your own content, third-party reviews, or competitor domains. Aiso does not expose citation source tracking as a primary feature, focusing instead on prompt discovery and three-state scoring. For content teams that need to know which pages drive AI citations, Riff Analytics is the better fit.