Athena HQ vs Riff Analytics in 2026: Free GEO audit + Claude vs $49/mo 7-engine with citation tracking
Athena HQ has a free Essential tier with content gap analysis and Claude coverage on 4 engines. Riff Analytics at $49+/month covers 7 engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama with citation source tracking and AI readiness audit.
Athena HQ has a free Essential tier with real Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) audit functionality. Riff Analytics starts at $49/month on Starter with no free tier; pricing is transparent and self-serve.
Riff Analytics covers 7 engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. Athena HQ covers 4 engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity.
Athena HQ includes content gap analysis as a core feature, comparing site content coverage to topics AI models cite. Riff Analytics focuses on citation source tracking and AI readiness audit, without editorial recommendations.
Neither tool includes API access on any plan. Athena HQ unlocks API access at the $295/month Starter tier while Riff Analytics does not offer API access on either tier.
Riff Analytics includes an AI readiness audit as a pre-monitoring check. Athena HQ does not include a separate readiness audit but provides a structured GEO audit on every tier.
For teams that need Grok and DeepSeek coverage on a $49/month budget, Riff Analytics is the practical choice. For teams that want free entry plus content gap depth with Claude coverage, Athena HQ is the appropriate fit.
Choosing between Athena HQ and Riff Analytics is a question about engine coverage breadth versus editorial depth on the free tier, with very different price points. Athena HQ is a self-serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform with a free Essential plan and a $295/month Starter tier that tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with content gap analysis. Riff Analytics is a self-serve AI visibility tracker at $49+/month covering 7 engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama with citation source tracking and an AI readiness audit. Athena HQ is the right pick if you want a free starting tier plus content gap depth with Claude coverage. Riff Analytics is the right pick if you have $49+/month budget and want broader engine coverage including Grok and DeepSeek. The right pick depends on whether free entry plus 4 engines beats $49/month entry with 7 engines.
The tools at a glance
Athena HQ
Free-to-start GEO audit platform with citation gap analysis and API access on paid plans
Athena HQ is a generative engine optimization platform built around a free GEO audit, paired with paid plans that unlock deeper analysis. It tracks brand appearances across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity on all tiers, including the free Essential plan. The standout feature is the Essential tier itself: a genuine free plan that runs a real audit of your AI citation performance, surfaces which competitors are winning in your category, and identifies content gaps that may be holding your brand back.
The paid plans focus on depth rather than coverage. Citation source tracking, unlimited competitor benchmarking, and API access unlock at the $295/month Starter tier, with no mid-priced option in between. The content gap analysis is the centerpiece of the platform: Athena HQ compares your site content coverage to the topics AI models are pulling from competitor sites, and flags specific topic areas to prioritize in your content calendar.
The main friction versus Riff Analytics is engine coverage. Athena HQ covers 4 engines while Riff Analytics covers 7 engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. For teams whose Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) programme primarily needs free entry plus content depth on the four major engines, Athena HQ is the practical choice. For teams whose priority is broader engine coverage at $49/month, Riff Analytics is the more appropriate fit.
| Feature | Essential Free | Starter $295/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| GEO audit | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content gap analysis | Basic | Full | Full |
| Citation source tracking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | 2 competitors | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Riff Analytics
AI brand visibility tracking across 7 LLM engines with citation source analysis, sentiment monitoring, and competitor benchmarking
Riff Analytics monitors brand mentions across 7 AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. Unlike tools that focus on a narrower set of models, Riff Analytics casts a wide net, which is useful for brands that want visibility across the full landscape of AI assistants rather than just the top two or three.
The platform monitors not just whether a brand appears in AI answers, but which sources those AI engines are citing when they mention it. The citation source tracking tells teams whether AI engines are pulling from their own content, third-party reviews, press coverage, or competitor domains, which informs where to invest in content and PR to improve AI visibility over time.
The AI readiness audit runs against a domain before monitoring begins, checking whether site structure, content, and entity signals are set up in a way that AI engines can discover and cite accurately. The trade-off versus Athena HQ is the absence of content gap analysis and the absence of a free tier. For teams that want $49/month entry with broader engine coverage, Riff Analytics is the practical choice. For teams that want a free audit plus content gap depth, Athena HQ is the more appropriate fit.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Pro $199/mo |
|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 7 | 7 |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI readiness audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Looker Studio connector | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity | 7 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama) |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes (content gap analysis) | No (citation source tracking + AI readiness audit instead) |
| Category intelligence | No | Limited |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Paid plans only (Starter $295/mo+) | No (not on any tier) |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | Limited | Limited |
| Starting price | Free (Essential) | $49/mo |
Need a self-serve white-label option beyond Athena HQ and Riff Analytics?

Neither Athena HQ nor Riff Analytics offers white-label delivery, and Riff Analytics has no API access on any tier. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies with white-label reports, guest access links, and read and write API on every plan from $50/month Starter. For SEO and marketing agencies that need multi-brand support with self-serve signup and a Looker Studio connector on every plan, AI Peekaboo covers what both tools leave out of standard pricing.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
Athena HQ and Riff Analytics track AI visibility at different scope and price points. Athena HQ is the focused editorial tool with free entry plus content gap depth on 4 engines. Riff Analytics is the breadth play: 7 engines at $49/month with citation source tracking and AI readiness audit but no editorial recommendations. Tools address different needs; pick by whether your priority is editorial depth or engine breadth.
Bottom line
If your priority is starting with a free Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) audit plus content recommendations with Claude coverage, Athena HQ at free or $295/month is the practical choice. If your priority is 7-engine coverage including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama with citation source tracking at $49+/month, Riff Analytics is the more appropriate fit. Match the tool to your engine breadth versus editorial depth priority.
Frequently asked questions
How does Athena HQ compare to Riff Analytics for AI visibility?
Athena HQ is a self-serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform with a free Essential plan and a $295/month Starter tier covering 4 engines with content gap analysis. Riff Analytics starts at $49/month on Starter covering 7 engines including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama with citation source tracking and AI readiness audit. Athena HQ fits teams that want free entry plus editorial depth. Riff Analytics fits teams that need broad engine coverage.
Which tool covers more AI engines?
Riff Analytics covers 7 engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. Athena HQ covers 4 engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. If Grok or DeepSeek coverage matters for your category, Riff Analytics is the stronger fit; if the four main engines are sufficient, Athena HQ covers them on every tier including free.
Does Athena HQ include content gap analysis on the free tier?
Yes. The Essential free plan includes a basic version of content gap analysis, comparing your site content coverage to topics AI models are pulling from competitors. Riff Analytics does not include content gap analysis. For editorial recommendations at free, Athena HQ is the appropriate choice.
Does Riff Analytics include an AI readiness audit?
Yes. Riff Analytics runs an AI readiness audit against a domain before ongoing monitoring begins, checking whether site structure, content, and entity signals are set up in a way AI engines can discover and cite accurately. Athena HQ provides a structured GEO audit on every tier, which is a different output but covers similar ground at a higher level.
Which tool is better for teams with $50-150/month budget?
Riff Analytics at $49+/month is the practical choice in this budget band for in-house teams that want broad engine coverage. Athena HQ's paid Starter at $295/month is above this band. For tight budgets, Riff Analytics provides broader coverage; for free evaluation, Athena HQ is the practical choice.
Does either tool offer API access?
Athena HQ unlocks API access on the $295/month Starter tier. Riff Analytics does not offer API access on either Starter or Pro. For teams with engineering workflows that need programmatic access, Athena HQ is the practical choice in this comparison.

