Comparison

Heap vs Usermaven in 2026: Autocapture product analytics vs B2B marketing attribution

One captures everything a user does inside your product with no setup. The other connects ad spend and CRM deal data to prove which campaigns actually closed revenue.

Updated July 3, 2026
Heap
Usermaven
Key takeaways
  • Heap autocaptures every click, pageview, and form event automatically; Usermaven requires standard event tracking setup but adds marketing attribution across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn Ads that Heap does not offer.
  • Usermaven's Scale plan connects to a CRM to calculate attribution against closed-won revenue and contract value; Heap has no CRM or deal-attribution feature at all.
  • Usermaven publishes transparent pricing at $84/month (Growth) and $199/month (Scale); Heap only discloses its Free tier, with Growth, Pro, and Premier requiring a sales conversation.
  • Usermaven offers white-label delivery for agencies managing multiple client accounts; Heap does not list white-label as a capability on any tier.
  • Heap has native iOS and Android SDKs for mobile app behavioral tracking; Usermaven's feature set is centered on web and product analytics plus ad-channel attribution, without a comparable mobile SDK mentioned.
  • Usermaven uses cookies and requires a GDPR consent banner for European visitors; Heap's data practices are oriented around first-party autocapture rather than a cookieless architecture.

Heap and Usermaven both sit in Analytics & Reporting, but they answer different questions for different teams. Heap autocaptures every product interaction from the moment its script is installed, so a product team can retroactively define metrics against behavioral history it never planned to track. Usermaven is built for B2B SaaS marketing teams who need to connect ad spend on Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to actual closed-won revenue in the CRM, not just lead volume, while also covering product-side engagement tracking. The overlap is real but narrow: both do funnel and retention analysis, but only Usermaven ties that back to deal value, and only Heap autocaptures without any event planning.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Heap$0SaaS product teams and growth teams that need full behavioral tracking across web and mobile without pre-planning every event, especially teams building funnels retroactively.
Usermaven$84/moB2B SaaS marketing teams that need to connect ad spend to closed-won revenue, and agencies that want white-labeled analytics covering both marketing attribution and product engagement.

Heap

Autocapture product analytics that records every user interaction automatically, so you never miss data from before you knew what to track.

Full review →
Heap screenshot

Heap's core mechanism is autocapture: install one script and every click, pageview, and form submission is recorded from that point forward, with no event taxonomy required in advance. Retroactive event definition means a team can ask a new question today and answer it against months of historical interaction data it never explicitly planned to collect.

Heap Illuminate applies automated data science across the full behavioral dataset to surface which user paths correlate most strongly with conversion or retention, reducing the need for analysts to manually hypothesize funnels. Native iOS and Android SDKs bring the same model to mobile apps, which Usermaven does not offer.

Since its 2023 acquisition by Contentsquare, Heap has gained session replay and heatmaps as paid add-ons and a shared Sense AI assistant. The tradeoff for evaluators is pricing opacity: only the Free tier (10,000 monthly sessions) is public, and every paid tier requires talking to sales.

Pricing
Feature
Free
$0
Growth
Contact sales
Pro
Contact sales
Premier
Contact sales
Monthly sessionsUp to 10kCustomCustomCustom
Autocapture and retroactive eventsYesYesYesYes
Marketing attribution (ads, CRM)NoNoNoNo
Sense AI assistantNoYesYesYes
Mobile SDK (iOS/Android)YesYesYesYes
Best for: SaaS product teams and growth teams that need full behavioral tracking across web and mobile without pre-planning every event, especially teams building funnels retroactively.

Usermaven

AI marketing attribution and product analytics for B2B SaaS teams who need to connect campaigns to revenue.

Full review →
Usermaven screenshot

Usermaven tracks the full B2B customer journey from first ad impression through product usage, connecting Google Ads, Meta Ads, and LinkedIn Ads data with CRM deal records to show which campaigns drove actual closed revenue rather than just leads or signups. Multiple attribution models (first touch, last touch, multi-touch) and conversion path analysis let teams see the real sequence of touchpoints before a deal closes.

The product analytics layer covers feature adoption, retention, DAU/MAU stickiness ratios, and funnel analysis, so it is not purely a marketing tool. Maven AI, available on the Scale plan, automates anomaly detection and insight generation, and pushes findings into Slack.

Usermaven includes a white-label option for agencies running analytics across multiple client accounts, which Heap does not offer. The tradeoff is that Usermaven uses cookies and requires a consent banner for European visitors, and the CRM integration plus paid-ads attribution that make the platform distinctive only unlock on the $199/month Scale plan.

Pricing
Feature
Growth
$84/mo
Scale
$199/mo
Enterprise
Custom
Paid ads attribution (Google, Meta, LinkedIn)NoYesYes
CRM and deal attributionNoYesYes
Maven AI insightsNoYesYes
White-label deliveryLimitedYesYes
Product analytics and funnelsYesYesYes
Best for: B2B SaaS marketing teams that need to connect ad spend to closed-won revenue, and agencies that want white-labeled analytics covering both marketing attribution and product engagement.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Heap
Usermaven
Autocapture / no-code instrumentationYesNo (standard event tracking)
Paid ads attribution (Google, Meta, LinkedIn)NoYes (Scale and Enterprise)
CRM / deal-level attributionNoYes (Scale and Enterprise)
Mobile SDK (iOS / Android)YesNo
AI-powered insight surfacingYes (Heap Illuminate, Sense Chat)Yes (Maven AI, Scale and Enterprise)
White-label deliveryNoYes (Scale and Enterprise)
Cookieless trackingNo (first-party autocapture, not cookieless-marketed)No, uses cookies
Free tierYes (10k sessions/mo)No (14-day trial instead)
Pricing transparencyFree tier only, paid plans require salesFully public per-tier pricing
Starting price$0$84/mo

Which should you choose?

B2B SaaS marketing teams proving which campaigns drove closed-won revenueUsermaven
Product teams needing behavioral data from before a metric was definedHeap
Agencies needing white-label analytics across multiple client accountsUsermaven
Mobile-first products needing iOS and Android usage trackingHeap
Teams wanting fully public pricing before signing upUsermaven
Teams prioritizing automated correlation analysis on in-product behaviorHeap

The honest answer is these tools solve adjacent but distinct problems. Usermaven is built to answer "which campaign actually produced revenue," a question that requires CRM and ad-platform data Heap does not touch at all. Heap is built to answer "what are users doing inside our product, including things we never planned to measure," a question Usermaven answers with standard event tracking rather than autocapture. A B2B SaaS company doing both performance marketing and deep product analytics might reasonably run Usermaven for the revenue-attribution side and something like Heap or Mixpanel for the product side, rather than expecting either tool to fully cover both jobs.

Bottom line

Choose Usermaven if your team runs paid campaigns on Google, Meta, or LinkedIn and needs to prove which ones actually closed revenue rather than just generated leads, especially if you also want white-label reporting for clients. Choose Heap if the real gap is understanding in-product user behavior with zero event-planning overhead and native mobile tracking. For a B2B SaaS company running both a serious paid acquisition motion and a complex product, expect to eventually need a tool from each category rather than one that fully replaces the other.

Frequently asked questions

Does Heap do marketing attribution like Usermaven?

No. Heap autocaptures in-product user behavior but has no integration with ad platforms like Google, Meta, or LinkedIn Ads, and no CRM connection for deal-level attribution. Usermaven was built specifically to connect ad spend to closed-won revenue, which is a capability Heap does not attempt to offer.

Is Usermaven a good replacement for Heap's autocapture?

Not exactly. Usermaven uses standard event tracking rather than Heap's autocapture-everything model, so you still need to plan which events to track. If retroactive analysis of unplanned behavioral data is the main reason you are considering Heap, Usermaven does not replicate that specific mechanism.

Which tool is cheaper for a small B2B SaaS team?

Heap's Free tier costs nothing up to 10,000 monthly sessions, but every paid tier beyond that requires a sales call with no visible pricing. Usermaven publishes its pricing directly: Growth starts at $84 per month, and the CRM and ad-attribution features that make it distinctive require the $199 per month Scale plan.

Can agencies white-label Heap or Usermaven for client reporting?

Usermaven offers a white-label option, making it usable for agencies running analytics under their own brand for multiple clients. Heap does not list white-label delivery as a capability on any of its tiers, so agencies using Heap would need a separate reporting layer to present data under their own branding.

Does Usermaven require a cookie consent banner in the way Heap might not?

Yes, Usermaven uses cookies for tracking, which means a GDPR-compliant consent banner is required for European visitors. Heap's documentation centers on first-party autocapture rather than being marketed as a cookieless solution, so evaluate both tools' current privacy documentation directly if cookie consent is a deciding factor.

Found this useful? Share it: