Comparison

Radarkit vs Wellows in 2026: API access from $29/mo versus five engines with outreach contacts and strategic calls

Cheapest API-enabled monitoring, or an end-to-end AI visibility workflow with verified outreach contacts?

Updated July 2, 2026
Radarkit
Wellows
Key takeaways
  • Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. Wellows does not currently advertise API access on any tier. For teams that need programmatic data delivery on a standard plan, Radarkit is the only answer in this AI visibility tool comparison.
  • Wellows tracks 5 engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity. Radarkit tracks 4: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Wellows includes Google AI Mode and AI Overviews; Radarkit includes Claude.
  • Radarkit Lite at $29/month is dramatically cheaper than Wellows Starter at $297/domain/month for full 5-engine coverage. The deciding factor is whether API access and low entry price or full 5-engine coverage plus outreach contacts matter more.
  • Wellows includes outreach templates with verified contacts on every tier and a Content Optimization feature that audits existing pages before recommending new content. Radarkit is monitoring and citation source identification only, with no outreach module.
  • Wellows includes 1 to 5 strategic monthly calls on every plan tier. Radarkit is self-serve software only, with no consultation layer.
  • Neither tool offers white-label delivery on standard plans. Both are built for in-house teams or single-brand workflows rather than agencies needing white-label reports.
  • For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows that need API access on a budget plan, Radarkit wins. For GEO workflows that need outreach contacts and strategic consultation on every tier, Wellows is the right choice.

If you are weighing Radarkit against Wellows, you are really choosing between two different AI visibility tool comparison philosophies. Radarkit tracks 4 engines with API access on every paid tier from $29/month, focused on accessible brand monitoring and citation source identification. Wellows tracks 5 engines (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity), goes beyond monitoring with content optimization that audits existing pages first, outreach templates with verified contacts, and strategic monthly calls on every tier, with full five-engine coverage requiring Starter at $297/domain/month. The right pick depends on whether API access on a budget plan or an end-to-end AI visibility workflow with outreach and consultation matters more to your team.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Radarkit$29/moIn-house teams, small businesses, and developers who need API access to AI citation data at the lowest entry price in the category, with no requirement for crawler logs, white-label delivery, or Google AI surface coverage.
Wellows$37/domain/moBrands and agencies that want an end-to-end AI visibility workflow with content optimization, outreach contacts, and strategic consultation baked in, with per-domain pricing that suits high-retainer engagements.

Radarkit

AI brand monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with API access

Full review →
Radarkit screenshot

Radarkit monitors brand mentions and citations across 4 AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The platform tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers, which sources the AI models cite, and how your visibility compares to competitors over time. The 4-platform scope is the defining feature: teams that prioritise Claude and Gemini coverage alongside the two biggest first-party AI search engines often shortlist Radarkit.

Where Radarkit stands out is on price and API access. The Lite plan at $29/month is the lowest paid entry point in the AI visibility category for a tool that includes API access across all four paid tiers. The Growth tier at $79/month unlocks competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis, and the Pro tier at $139/month adds unlimited historical data. For developers and analysts building custom reporting stacks, this combination is the deciding factor in this AI visibility tool comparison.

The gaps to plan around are scope and delivery. Radarkit does not currently track Google AI Overviews or Google AI Mode, which matters for SEO teams whose audiences are asking questions in Google search. There is no white-label delivery or branded client view on any tier, so agencies delivering AI visibility reports to clients would need a separate reporting layer. For internal Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) tracking on a tight budget, Radarkit is a credible option.

Pricing
Feature
Lite
$29/mo
Growth
$79/mo
Pro
$139/mo
Enterprise
Contact
AI models tracked4444
API access
Competitor benchmarking
Citation source analysis
Historical trend data30 days90 daysUnlimitedUnlimited
White label
Best for: In-house teams, small businesses, and developers who need API access to AI citation data at the lowest entry price in the category, with no requirement for crawler logs, white-label delivery, or Google AI surface coverage.

Wellows

AI visibility platform that tracks citations, optimizes content, and surfaces outreach contacts in one place

Full review →
Wellows screenshot

Wellows is an AI visibility platform that tracks brand citations across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity, then gives you tools to act on what you find. Where most AI visibility tools stop at the monitoring dashboard, Wellows adds content optimization, outreach discovery, and a customized 90-day AI visibility plan built into the product. The 5-engine coverage is the entry tier requirement for full visibility.

The platform is structured around two main use cases: in-house brand teams who need to understand and fix how AI platforms represent them, and agencies who want to run multiple client accounts from one place. Both use cases get the same core monitoring plus the action layer. The Content Optimization feature, currently in beta, audits your existing site pages before flagging gaps, which is a meaningfully different workflow from tools that simply generate a topic list.

The outreach module surfaces relevant pages where your brand is not being cited and provides contact details so you can request inclusion, which rounds out the platform into something closer to a full AI search workflow than a reporting tool. Per-domain pricing means agency margins require careful management, but the platform includes 1 to 5 strategic monthly calls depending on tier, which makes it more of a managed-service hybrid than a pure self-serve SaaS tool.

Pricing
Feature
Lite
$37/domain/mo
Essential
$97/domain/mo
Starter
$297/domain/mo
Pro
$497/domain/mo
Answer engines tracked1 (ChatGPT)2 (ChatGPT, AI Overviews)5 (all engines)5 (all engines)
Prompts tracked per month401004001,000
Responses analyzed per month1,2006,00060,000150,000
Content generation credits251570
Outreach opportunitiesUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Brand sentiment analysis
GSC integration
Daily monitoring
All-time history
Strategic monthly calls1235
Content Optimization (beta)
Free trial7 days7 days7 days7 days
Best for: Brands and agencies that want an end-to-end AI visibility workflow with content optimization, outreach contacts, and strategic consultation baked in, with per-domain pricing that suits high-retainer engagements.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Radarkit
Wellows
AI engines trackedChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, PerplexityChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity (full coverage on Starter+)
Competitive share-of-voiceYes (Growth and up)Yes (prompt-level)
Prompt-level citation dataYesYes
Answer / content gap analysisNoYes (Content Optimization audits existing pages)
Category intelligenceNoNo
AEO content generationNoYes (content generation credits)
Crawler / AI bot log accessNoNo
Page content auditsNoYes (Content Optimization)
API accessYes, all paid plansNot advertised
Looker Studio / BI connectorNoNo
White-label deliveryNoNo
Pay-per-prompt pricingNoNo
Agency multi-brand supportNoYes (multi-client with per-domain)
Starting price$29/mo$37/domain/mo (Lite, ChatGPT only)

Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Radarkit and Wellows?

AI Peekaboo dashboard

Both Radarkit and Wellows lack white-label delivery on standard plans, which forces agencies to build their own reporting layer around API exports or per-domain costs. AI Peekaboo is an AI visibility monitoring tool with white-label delivery, guest access links, multi-brand agency support, and a read/write API starting at $50/month. Built for SEO agencies sending branded reports to clients.

Read the AI Peekaboo review →

Which should you choose?

Developers and analysts who need API access at the cheapest priceRadarkit
Agencies wanting outreach contacts and strategic monthly calls on every tierWellows
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows needing programmatic data on a budgetRadarkit
Brands that need Google AI Mode coverage alongside AI OverviewsWellows
Content teams that need pre-creation site audits to avoid keyword cannibalizationWellows
Solo operators who need API access at sub-$50/monthRadarkit
Teams that want to evaluate first with a 7-day free trialWellows

Radarkit and Wellows serve different audiences with different operating models. Radarkit is the cheapest API-enabled monitoring tool with brand-first framing. Wellows is an end-to-end AI visibility workflow with content optimization, outreach contacts, and strategic calls baked into every tier. The trade-off is API access on a budget versus integrated workflow with consultation.

Bottom line

Radarkit answers how a developer or analyst can pull AI visibility data into a custom reporting stack at $29/month with API access on every paid tier. Wellows answers how an in-house brand team or agency can run an end-to-end AI visibility workflow with outreach contacts and strategic consultation included at every tier. If API access on a budget plan is the deciding factor, Radarkit. If an integrated workflow with verified outreach contacts is the deciding factor, Wellows.

Frequently asked questions

How does Radarkit compare to Wellows on API access?

Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. Wellows does not currently advertise API access on any tier. For teams that need programmatic data delivery on a standard plan, Radarkit is the only answer in this AI visibility tool comparison.

Which tool has outreach contacts, Radarkit or Wellows?

Wellows includes outreach templates with verified contacts on every tier, surfacing pages where your brand is not being cited and providing contact details for outreach. Radarkit does not include an outreach module. For PR and content teams whose AI visibility workflow depends on outreach, Wellows is the answer.

Which is best for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, Radarkit or Wellows?

For GEO workflows that need API access on the cheapest plan, Radarkit is the right choice. For GEO workflows that prioritise outreach contacts, content optimization that audits existing pages, and strategic monthly consultation, Wellows is the right choice. Neither tool offers API access on standard plans for Wellows.

How much does Radarkit cost compared to Wellows?

Radarkit Lite is $29/month with API access; Growth is $79/month adding competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis; Pro is $139/month with unlimited historical data; Enterprise is contact-based. Wellows Lite is $37/domain/month for ChatGPT only; Essential is $97/domain/month for 2 engines; Starter is $297/domain/month for full 5-engine coverage; Pro is $497/domain/month. Radarkit is dramatically cheaper at the entry tier for full coverage.

Which tool tracks Google AI Mode, Radarkit or Wellows?

Wellows tracks Google AI Mode on Starter and above. Radarkit does not currently track Google AI Mode or Google AI Overviews. For teams whose audiences ask questions in Google search, Wellows is the only option in this comparison.

Can I use Radarkit or Wellows for agency client reporting?

Neither tool offers white-label delivery on standard plans. Wellows supports multi-client setups with per-domain pricing and strategic calls that suit agency workflows, but lacks white-label delivery. For agencies needing white-label reports under their own brand, look at platforms built specifically for agency delivery.

Found this useful? Share it: