Riff Analytics vs Goodie vs Writesonic GEO in 2026: Three AI Visibility Approaches for Citation-Focused Brands
One tool tracks brand mentions across 7 AI engines with citation source detail. Another connects monitoring to revenue. The third ranks the actions themselves.
Riff Analytics
Goodie
Writesonic GEO- Riff Analytics is the broadest pure-monitoring tool in this comparison at $49/month, tracking 7 AI engines and showing the cited URL behind every brand mention. Built for in-house teams who want citation source visibility without paying enterprise prices.
- Goodie is the only one of the three with a closed-loop AEO system: monitoring, prioritized optimization actions, an AEO content writer, agentic commerce tracking, and revenue attribution tied back to Google Analytics. Pricing starts at $399/month for just 3 engines.
- Writesonic GEO covers 10+ AI engines and ships with an Action Center that ranks optimization opportunities by estimated impact. Content rewriting tools are built in, so the diagnosis-to-fix loop stays in one platform. White-label delivery is included on Growth and Enterprise.
- Riff Analytics has no API or white-label delivery on any plan. If data needs to leave the platform or get delivered to clients under your own brand, neither standard option works. Goodie locks API access to Enterprise; Writesonic GEO does not expose an API on any tier.
- All three are built for different price points. Riff Analytics is the affordable self-serve option, Goodie is enterprise-positioned with a $399 starter and demo-call gates above that, and Writesonic GEO splits the middle at $79/month with a self-serve plan.
- Only Goodie connects monitoring to revenue through Google Analytics attribution on the Pro plan and custom modeling on Enterprise. For teams that need to defend AI visibility spend internally, this is the clearest differentiator in the comparison.
If you need to know which pages AI engines are pulling from when they mention your brand and which engines surface you at all, three tools take notably different routes to the answer. Riff Analytics monitors seven AI models and logs every cited URL alongside each mention, giving you the rawest view of what is driving visibility in generative engine optimization (GEO) terms. Goodie layers an action engine on top of monitoring, with prioritized optimization actions, an AEO content writer, crawler-behavior analysis, and revenue attribution through Google Analytics. Writesonic GEO sits in between, with 10+ AI engines covered and an Action Center that ranks what to fix first, then lets you rewrite content inside the platform. The right pick depends on whether you want citation source depth, a closed-loop AEO system with revenue proof, or a fast to-do list of high-impact rewrites.
The tools at a glance
Riff Analytics
AI brand visibility tracking across 7 LLM engines with citation source analysis, sentiment monitoring, and competitor benchmarking
Riff Analytics tracks brand mentions across seven AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. That model breadth is the headline: most AI visibility tools stop at five engines. Beyond raw mention counts, the platform records the specific URLs each model cited when mentioning your brand. That citation source layer is what makes the data actionable for a GEO programme, because it shows whether AI models are pulling from your blog, review sites, third-party press, or competitor domains.
The platform runs an AI readiness audit before monitoring goes live, which gives you a baseline of how discoverable your content is to LLM crawlers. Mention trend monitoring tracks how frequency and sentiment shift over time, and competitor benchmarking shows share-of-voice against brands in your category. Both views are useful for understanding whether a content push or PR campaign is moving the needle on AI citations, and whether competitors are gaining or losing ground.
Riff Analytics is positioned as a self-serve in-house tool. There is no API on any plan, no white-label delivery, no client guest access links, and no Looker Studio connector. That limits it for agencies. For brands that need broad model coverage and citation source visibility without paying enterprise prices, $49/month Starter or $199/month Pro handles the core monitoring job.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Pro $199/mo |
|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 7 | 7 |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI readiness audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Looker Studio connector | ✗ | ✗ |
Goodie
End-to-end AEO platform covering 12 AI models with agentic commerce and revenue attribution
Goodie is an enterprise answer engine optimization platform that covers the full GEO workflow: prompt research, brand monitoring across 12 AI models, prioritized optimization actions, AEO content generation, crawler behavior analysis, and revenue attribution through Google Analytics. The platform covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, and Sparky, which is the widest coverage in the category.
What separates Goodie from simpler monitoring tools is the action layer and the analytics layer. The Optimization Actions feature generates a prioritized list of specific changes for both owned and earned assets, ranking them by estimated impact. The Agent Experience Suite shows how AI crawlers actually traverse your site and where technical gaps prevent discovery. The Analytics module ties AI citations to traffic and conversions in Google Analytics, so the platform defends itself as a line item with revenue data rather than just a marketing tool.
Pricing reflects the depth. Explorer starts at $399/month for three engines and 100 prompts, and Pro and Enterprise both require a sales conversation. The Explore plan includes a 30-day money-back guarantee, which makes initial evaluation lower risk. Goodie ships an MCP server on every plan, so the platform integrates into Claude, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible workflows without a separate build.
| Feature | Explorer $399/mo | Pro Contact sales | Enterprise Contact sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 3 (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity) | 6 (+Gemini, Copilot, Rufus) | Up to 11 (all major engines) |
| Prompts per month | 100 | 250 | 500+ |
| Optimization actions/mo | 10 | 30 | 60+ |
| MCP server access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agentic commerce visibility | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue attribution | Google Analytics | Full attribution | Custom modeling |
| API and data export | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-brand tracking | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Writesonic GEO
AI Search Growth Engine tracking brand visibility across 10+ AI platforms with content optimization
Writesonic GEO is the GEO layer built into the Writesonic content generation platform. It tracks brand mentions across 10+ AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Microsoft Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews. Sitting on top of the broader Writesonic stack means GEO also gets access to a strong AI content generation engine, which is not true of pure monitoring tools.
The Action Center is the most distinctive feature. Rather than presenting a raw visibility dashboard and leaving interpretation to you, the Action Center analyses visibility gaps across all tracked platforms, identifies where competitors are being cited instead of your brand, and ranks optimization opportunities by estimated impact. When the Action Center flags content that needs improvement, the platform can rewrite or improve it inside the GEO interface, which closes the diagnosis-to-fix loop without a separate tool.
Citation management and technical audits round out the GEO feature set. Citation management surfaces off-page opportunities to build citations on Reddit, YouTube, and relevant blogs. Technical audits check whether AI crawlers can actually access your content. White-label delivery is included on the Growth plan and up. There is no API on any tier, which is the main limit for agencies who need to pipe data into custom dashboards.
| Feature | Starter $79/mo | Basic $199/mo | Growth $399/mo | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI platforms tracked | 10+ | 10+ | 10+ | 10+ |
| Action Center | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content rewriting tools | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation management | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Technical audits | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Riff Analytics | Goodie | Writesonic GEO |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama | ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, Sparky | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Microsoft Copilot, Meta AI, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | No | Yes | Yes |
| Category intelligence | No | Yes | No |
| AEO content generation | No | Yes (Content Studio) | Yes (built-in rewriting) |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | Yes (Agent Experience Suite) | No |
| Page content audits | No | Yes | Yes (technical audits) |
| API access | No | Enterprise only | No |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | On request | Growth and Enterprise |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | Enterprise only | No |
| Starting price | $49/mo | $399/mo | $79/mo |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Riff Analytics, Goodie, and Writesonic GEO?
AI Peekaboo is the self-serve AI visibility platform to compare against Riff Analytics, Goodie, and Writesonic GEO. AI Peekaboo ships read and write API, white-label delivery, and 5 AI surfaces on every plan from $50/month, covering what each tool gates differently. For SEO agencies and in-house teams that need programmatic data access and branded client reports without enterprise contracts, AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool under $100/month.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
Riff AnalyticsGoodieWritesonic GEORiff AnalyticsGoodieWritesonic GEOWritesonic GEORiff Analytics is the most affordable way to monitor 7 AI engines with citation source detail but stops at monitoring. Goodie is the deepest AEO platform in the market with a $399 entry price and revenue attribution but requires commitment and demo calls above that. Writesonic GEO is the strongest middle path for teams that want a ranked action list and built-in rewriting without enterprise pricing on day one.
Bottom line
Each tool answers a different question. Riff Analytics answers "where do AI models cite my brand, and which URLs are they pulling from". Goodie answers "what is the full AEO programme, and what revenue did it drive". Writesonic GEO answers "what should I rewrite first, and can you rewrite it inside this platform". Start with the question that matches where you are in your GEO journey.
Frequently asked questions
Which tool is the most affordable entry point?
Riff Analytics at $49/month is the cheapest option of the three and the only one under $79/month. Writesonic GEO starts at $79/month. Goodie starts at $399/month for just 3 engines, which makes it the most expensive entry point but also the most feature-complete.
Which tool covers the most AI engines?
Goodie covers the most with 12 models including Amazon Rufus and Sparky. Writesonic GEO covers 10+ on every plan including Grok, DeepSeek, and Meta AI. Riff Analytics tracks 7 models including Llama, which most competitors skip.
Do any of these tools offer a free trial?
Goodie offers a free trial on the Explorer plan with a 30-day money-back guarantee. Riff Analytics and Writesonic GEO do not publicly advertise a free trial, though both have offered evaluation access on request. None of the three have a permanent free tier.
Can I use these tools for agency client reporting?
Writesonic GEO is the only one that includes white-label delivery on a self-serve tier (Growth and above). Goodie supports multi-brand tracking but only on Enterprise. Riff Analytics has no white-label option on any plan and is positioned for in-house use. If agency delivery is a hard requirement, only Writesonic GEO meets it without a demo call.
Which tool provides AEO content generation inside the platform?
Goodie has a full Content Studio with an AEO writer that generates brand-aligned content designed for LLM citation. Writesonic GEO can rewrite and improve existing content directly inside the platform. Riff Analytics does not have content generation: it focuses on monitoring and citation source tracking.
What does Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) mean in this context?
GEO is the practice of optimizing content, technical signals, and citations so AI engines cite your brand in their generated answers. All three tools are GEO platforms, but they differ in what part of the GEO workflow they automate: Riff Analytics on measurement, Goodie on the full closed loop with revenue attribution, and Writesonic GEO on the prioritized action list plus rewriting.