Ads Lighthouse vs SwipeHarbor in 2026: search-ad evidence vs specialist creative research
Ads Lighthouse watches the Google and Bing brand searches a team configures and preserves what appeared. SwipeHarbor is a paid library for NewsBreak, Rumble, and YouTube examples, landing-page evidence, collections, and read-only MCP research.
Ads Lighthouse checks configured Google and Bing paid results on every plan; Shopping begins on Growth. SwipeHarbor currently covers NewsBreak, Rumble, and YouTube.
Ads Lighthouse Starter is $49 monthly and includes one project, 20 keywords, two locations, and 7,500 scheduled checks.
SwipeHarbor Pro costs $79.99 monthly or $749 paid upfront for a year, with one paid membership rather than tiered plans.
SwipeHarbor records can include first-seen and last-seen dates, sightings, device context, available landing-page evidence, and Rumble transcripts when ready.
Ads Lighthouse supports affiliate matching, policy cases, redirect traces, email or Slack alerts, and evidence packs on eligible plans.
SwipeHarbor includes private collections, notes, and an MCP interface with four read-only archive tools for active paid members.
Both products are explicit that observed records are not proof of spend, conversions, profitability, or uninterrupted delivery.
These are specialist products for people who have outgrown a generic screenshot folder, but their specialties barely overlap. Ads Lighthouse answers an accountability question around search advertising: what was shown on a defined query, where, when, and where did it lead? SwipeHarbor answers a creative-research question in three less commonly served channels: what did a captured NewsBreak, Rumble, or YouTube ad look like, what destination evidence is available, and how should the team preserve the finding? Ads Lighthouse is the choice for monitored Google or Bing brand terms and repeatable evidence workflows. SwipeHarbor is the choice when one of its three current networks is strategically important and a creative lead needs collections, notes, and MCP-assisted archive queries. Neither is a general media-buying console, nor can either prove that a competitor made money.
The tools at a glance
Ads Lighthouse
Configured brand-search monitoring with policy, affiliate, and reporting workflows
Ads Lighthouse is the narrower but more evidentiary choice when a team monitors branded paid search. Users create a project with domains, keywords, markets, devices, and a schedule, then receive saved observations from Google and Bing. Growth and above add Google Shopping product listings. A finding retains the search term, engine, location, device, timestamp, advertiser domain, ad copy, and destination URL. This is useful when a legal, affiliate, or PPC team needs to answer exactly what appeared rather than browse for an interesting example.
Its useful details sit after the observation. Paid Results can be explored by advertiser, keyword, copy changes, and destination. Affiliate parameter and ID matching helps managers separate known from unfamiliar IDs. Policy rules can assess saved copy, position, and destinations, while eligible links can be traced server-side. New or returning advertisers, brand mentions, and affiliate findings can trigger email, Slack, or webhook alerts. The product does not infer a keyword purchase, spend, infringement, or Google impression share from the record it saved.
Starter costs $49 monthly for one project, 20 keywords, two locations, and 7,500 scheduled checks, with daily frequency. Growth is $99 and adds Shopping plus a six-hour schedule. Scale at $299 adds API keys, REST API access, white-label PDF reports, and a larger allowance. It is not a way to research NewsBreak, Rumble, or YouTube creative, which makes it a poor substitute for SwipeHarbor when those networks define the brief.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Growth $99/mo | Scale $299/mo | Business $599/mo | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search ad monitoring | Google, Bing | Google, Bing, Shopping | Google, Bing, Shopping | Google, Bing, Shopping | Google, Bing, Shopping |
| Scheduled checks | 7,500 | 18,000 | 60,000 | 144,000 | Agreed |
| Fastest schedule | Daily | 6 hours | 2 hours | Hourly | 15 minutes |
| API and white-label | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
SwipeHarbor
NewsBreak, Rumble, and YouTube creative archive with evidence, notes, and MCP access
SwipeHarbor is deliberately narrow: its paid library currently covers NewsBreak, Rumble, and YouTube, not Meta, TikTok, Google Search, or Display. That constraint is its value for a researcher whose real work lives in one of the supported channels. Searches can use keyword, advertiser, domain, format, date, final-page address, sightings, or observed days. A captured record may retain a video or image creative, first-seen and last-seen dates, device context, landing-page evidence, and, for Rumble where ready, a transcript.
The product is designed to help research survive handoff. Paid members can put examples into private collections and add notes, keeping the source, message, destination evidence, and rationale next to each other before a brief is written. The membership also includes a read-only MCP interface for verified active accounts. Its documented operations search stored ads, retrieve evidence, inspect recorded funnel steps, and compare two to four records. Those tools return archive evidence, not an advertiser's private data or a campaign-management surface.
There is one Pro membership at $79.99 per month or $749 upfront annually. Both include the three-network library, private collections, notes, and MCP access, which has shared monthly request, data-unit, token, and account limits. SwipeHarbor says a captured date or sightings count does not prove continuous delivery, spend, conversion, or profit. Buy it when the supported channels recur in your research work; for brand-search monitoring, Ads Lighthouse has the workflow SwipeHarbor intentionally does not attempt.
| Feature | Pro monthly $79.99/mo | Pro yearly $749/year upfront |
|---|---|---|
| Paid-library networks | NewsBreak, Rumble, YouTube | NewsBreak, Rumble, YouTube |
| Private collections and notes | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP access | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP requests / UTC month | 2,000 | 2,000 |
| MCP data units / UTC month | 10,000 | 10,000 |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Brand-search evidence | Creative research archive |
| Current paid coverage | Google, Bing, Shopping from Growth | NewsBreak, Rumble, YouTube |
| Configured scheduled monitoring | Yes | No |
| Creative and destination evidence | Observed search ad, copy, destination, trace where eligible | Captured creative, dates, and available landing-page evidence |
| Private research collections | Not published as collections | Yes |
| Affiliate / policy case workflow | Yes | No |
| MCP access | Yes, every plan | Yes, paid members |
| REST API | Scale and higher | MCP only, not a separate REST API |
| White-label reports | Scale and higher | Not published |
| Starting price | $49/mo | $79.99/mo |
Which should you choose?
Ads Lighthouse and SwipeHarbor are not opposing versions of the same database. The first is a monitoring system that produces a controlled record from search conditions a team chooses. The second is a focused creative library where the value lies in captured examples, available funnel evidence, organization, and access to an archive through MCP. The sensible choice is therefore channel-led: Google or Bing brand searches point to Ads Lighthouse; NewsBreak, Rumble, or YouTube creative research points to SwipeHarbor.
Bottom line
Use Ads Lighthouse for a search-ad evidence process, starting at $49 per month if its Starter limits cover the brand, terms, and markets you need. It becomes especially compelling where affiliate IDs, redirect traces, policy cases, or white-label reports matter. Use SwipeHarbor when its three current networks are central to the creative brief and the team needs collections, notes, and read-only MCP queries. Do not buy SwipeHarbor expecting Meta or TikTok coverage today, and do not buy Ads Lighthouse expecting a broad creative archive.
Frequently asked questions
Should I choose Ads Lighthouse or SwipeHarbor for NewsBreak competitor ad research?
SwipeHarbor is the relevant choice for NewsBreak competitor ad research because its paid library currently includes NewsBreak and can preserve captured creative, observed dates, available landing-page evidence, collections, and notes. Ads Lighthouse monitors Google and Bing paid searches instead, so it does not provide a NewsBreak research archive.
Can SwipeHarbor show who is bidding on my brand in Google Search?
SwipeHarbor cannot show who is bidding on a configured Google brand search because Google Search is outside its current paid-library coverage. Ads Lighthouse is built for that job: it checks configured Google and Bing searches and records the advertiser, copy, destination, device, location, and time behind observed ads.
Which product has better evidence for an affiliate-compliance investigation?
Ads Lighthouse has the stronger affiliate-compliance workflow because it can match known affiliate IDs in saved Google ad links, retain evidence, trace eligible redirects, and organize policy cases. SwipeHarbor can retain available destination evidence for supported archive records, but its published workflow does not include affiliate-ID matching or case management.
How does SwipeHarbor MCP access help a creative research team?
SwipeHarbor MCP access lets verified active paid members search stored ads, read one record's evidence, inspect recorded funnel steps, and compare two to four records through four read-only tools. It is useful for deliberate archive research, but its shared monthly limits and narrow three-network coverage make it different from a high-volume extraction API.
Do either Ads Lighthouse or SwipeHarbor prove that a competitor campaign is successful?
Neither Ads Lighthouse nor SwipeHarbor proves that a competitor campaign is successful. Ads Lighthouse records observed appearances on configured searches, while SwipeHarbor records captured creative and observation evidence; both products distinguish those records from spend, conversion, profitability, or uninterrupted-delivery proof.
Vast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.

