Foreplay vs Meta Ad Library in 2026: paid-social workflow vs public Meta records
Meta Ad Library is the first-party place to inspect active Meta ads and defined transparency records. Foreplay turns selected creative into boards, monitored competitor evidence, connected-account analysis, and production briefs for teams that make ads regularly.
Foreplay
Meta Ad Library- Meta Ad Library is Meta's free first-party search surface for ads currently running across Meta technologies, searchable by keyword or advertiser.
- Foreplay Discovery searches a published database of more than 200 million ads, and Swipe File puts selected references into shareable boards.
- Meta keeps seven years of social-issue, election, and political ads, one year of EU ads, and one year of qualifying UK ads, but does not publish an equivalent worldwide retention window for every commercial ad.
- Foreplay Workflow costs $149 per month billed annually and adds Spyder competitor monitoring, one Lens brand, and MCP, API, and AI-tool connections.
- Meta's Report and API expose political and issue-ad transparency data under defined scopes, not general ecommerce spend or conversion reporting.
- Foreplay can save references from Meta Ad Library through its extension, but it is not a replacement for Meta's public disclosure surface.
Start with Meta Ad Library when the question is whether a competitor is currently running a Meta ad, what the publicly visible creative looks like, or what a defined political, issue, EU, or UK transparency record says. It is a free first-party surface, searchable by keyword or advertiser. Choose Foreplay when those discoveries need to become a working creative system: its Discovery database, Swipe File boards, Spyder monitoring, Lens account analysis, and Briefs product give a team somewhere to compare, discuss, and turn references into new work. Meta Ad Library is evidence from Meta. Foreplay is a paid workflow around creative research. Normal commercial ads are not a permanent worldwide historical archive in the Library, while Foreplay should not be treated as Meta's official transparency record. The sharpest workflow is often to find evidence in the Library and organize the useful material in Foreplay.
The tools at a glance
Foreplay
Paid-social creative workflow for finding, saving, analysing, monitoring, and briefing ads
Foreplay turns a useful ad discovery into a team asset. Discovery searches a database Foreplay describes as holding more than 200 million ads, with filters, AI search, transcriptions, creative analysis, emotional analysis, and persona or target detection. Swipe File gives those references a home in shared boards. Its Chrome extension and mobile app can save Meta Ad Library ads, TikTok Creative Center entries, Instagram organic posts, and other supported sources, preserving the reference and its context instead of leaving a team with a pile of screenshots.
On Workflow and Agency, Foreplay becomes a recurring competitive-research system. Spyder watches named brands and exposes material such as ad history, creative tests, media mix, timelines, landing pages, and repeated hooks. Lens connects a team's own Meta and TikTok accounts for creative analysis and shareable reports. Briefs converts selected evidence into scripts, storyboards, modular sections, and direction. Those are useful production layers, but they do not reveal a competitor's actual bid, targeting, revenue, or return.
Basic costs $49 per month billed annually for one user, Discovery, and Swipe File. Workflow costs $149 for five users and adds 10 or more Spyder brands, one Lens brand, and MCP, API, and AI-tool connections. Agency is $389 for 10 users, 50 or more Spyder brands, and 10 or more Lens brands. Each self-serve plan lists a seven-day trial. The right purchase is Workflow or above only when monitoring, owned-account analysis, or integration work will happen regularly.
| Feature | Basic $49/mo annually | Workflow $149/mo annually | Agency $389/mo annually | Enterprise Custom pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included users | 1 | 5 | 10 | Unlimited |
| Discovery and Swipe File | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Spyder competitor brands | Not included | 10+ annually unlimited | 50+ annually unlimited | Unlimited |
| Lens connected brands | Not included | 1 | 10+ | Unlimited |
| MCP, API, and AI-tool connections | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trial | 7 days | 7 days | 7 days | Talk to sales |
Meta Ad Library
Meta's public search library for active ads, political and issue-ad history, EU and UK transparency records, and paid-partnership content
Meta Ad Library is public infrastructure rather than a subscription product. Users set a location, select an ad category, then search active ads across Meta technologies by keyword or advertiser. That makes it the first place to check a public Meta creative claim. It is an observation surface, not an account audit: a result does not show the advertiser's conversion results, revenue, bid strategy, or full targeting setup.
The historical scope depends on the record. Meta says it retains seven years of social-issue, election, and political ads, one year of ads delivered anywhere in the European Union, and one year of qualifying UK ads. The Ad Library Report is a separate research and download surface for social-issue, election, and political advertising, including spending detail by advertiser and location. Those transparency fields should not be carried over into claims about ordinary ecommerce or lead-generation campaigns.
Meta also publishes an Ad Library API for scoped custom searches. It covers political, election, and issue ads delivered worldwide during the past seven years, as well as any ads delivered to the UK or EU during the past year. Its stated onboarding requires a Facebook account, identity and location confirmation, and a Meta for Developers account. The library and API are valuable evidence sources, but they do not offer the boards, annotations, collaboration, alerts, or briefing process that a creative team needs once research becomes routine.
| Feature |
|---|
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Foreplay | Meta Ad Library |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Creative research and production workflow | Public Meta ad and transparency lookup |
| Starting cost | $49/mo annually | Free public access |
| Current Meta ad search | Supports saving from Meta Ad Library and other sources | Yes |
| Keyword or advertiser lookup | Discovery and supported saved sources | Yes |
| Creative boards and briefs | Yes | No |
| Competitor monitoring | Workflow and above | No |
| Connected Meta and TikTok analysis | Workflow and above | No |
| Political and issue-ad history | No | Yes, defined political, issue, EU, and UK scopes |
| General commercial spend or ROAS | No | No |
Which should you choose?
Meta Ad LibraryForeplayMeta Ad LibraryMeta Ad Library and Foreplay are strongest together because one supplies first-party public records and the other supplies the working layer around them. A direct search in the Library is better evidence for what Meta exposes publicly. Foreplay is better once a team needs to organize examples, monitor competitors, analyse its own creative, and turn findings into a brief. The mistake is asking either product to do the other's job: Foreplay is not Meta's compliance archive, and the Library is not an agency creative workspace.
Bottom line
Use Meta Ad Library first when the question concerns a live Meta ad or a stated transparency record. Pay for Foreplay when your team repeatedly collects creative references and needs boards, monitoring, account analysis, or briefs. Foreplay Basic suits individual saving and research; Workflow is the sensible tier when Spyder or Lens will be used. Keep the Library in the process whenever first-party Meta evidence matters. Neither provides a competitor's real revenue, conversion data, or campaign return.
Frequently asked questions
Is Foreplay or Meta Ad Library better for finding a competitor's active Facebook and Instagram ads?
Meta Ad Library is the better first check for a competitor's currently active Facebook and Instagram ads because it is Meta's public first-party search surface. Foreplay is the better next step when the team needs to save selected ads, compare them in boards, monitor competitors, and make a production brief.
Can Foreplay replace Meta Ad Library for political ad transparency research?
Foreplay cannot replace Meta Ad Library for political ad transparency research because Meta's Library, Report, and API provide the defined first-party political and issue-ad record. Foreplay can organize a team's wider creative research, but it should not be cited as Meta's official archive or disclosure source.
How long does Meta Ad Library keep normal commercial ads after they stop running?
Meta Ad Library does not publish a worldwide historical retention period for every normal commercial ad after it stops running. Meta does state seven years for social-issue, election, and political ads, one year for EU ads, and one year for qualifying UK ads, so the record type matters.
Does Foreplay connect to a Meta Ads account and show campaign performance?
Foreplay Lens connects a team's own Meta and TikTok accounts to analyse creative and build shareable reports, but Foreplay is not a console for publishing ads or changing bids. It also does not expose a competitor's private performance, revenue, or conversion records.
Is Meta Ad Library enough for an agency that needs a client creative swipe file?
Meta Ad Library is enough to find public ad records, but it does not provide the boards, annotations, recurring competitor monitoring, team collaboration, or briefing workflow an agency needs for a client swipe file. Foreplay is the better fit once the agency needs to turn found creative into an ongoing process.
Reviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEOVast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
Checked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.