Goodie vs Ranksmith in 2026: Closed-Loop AEO vs $69/mo Public Beta Tracker
Twelve-model closed-loop AEO from $399/month, or five-engine GEO platform with Prompt Prioritization from $69/month.
Goodie
Ranksmith- Goodie tracks up to twelve AI models on Enterprise. Ranksmith tracks 5 AI engines with tier-gated coverage: Starter sees ChatGPT and Perplexity, Pro adds Gemini, Enterprise adds Grok and Claude.
- Goodie Explorer starts at $399/month for three engines, with Pro and Enterprise requiring a demo call. Ranksmith Starter is $69/month, Pro is $149/month, Enterprise is $549/month, all with a free trial and no credit card required.
- Ranksmith ships Prompt Prioritization scoring that ranks every tracked prompt against current position, mention rate, and link rate. Goodie's equivalent is the Optimization Actions playbook on Pro and Enterprise.
- Ranksmith does not currently advertise API access on any tier. Goodie ships an MCP server on every plan but locks REST API access to Enterprise.
- Ranksmith is in public beta with rough edges expected. Goodie is a mature enterprise platform with SOC 2-compliant infrastructure.
- How does Goodie compare to Ranksmith on revenue attribution? Goodie ties AI citations to Google Analytics conversions; Ranksmith focuses on citation extraction and source attribution without revenue proof.
Choosing between Goodie and Ranksmith is really a question about maturity and execution scope. Goodie is a closed-loop AEO platform with twelve-model monitoring, optimization actions, agentic commerce visibility, crawler log analysis, AEO content generation, and revenue attribution tied to Google Analytics. Ranksmith is a public beta GEO platform with published pricing from $69/month, tracking five AI engines with Prompt Prioritization scoring, citation extraction, and source attribution. Both platforms serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, but the depth versus accessibility tradeoff is significant. Goodie is a mature enterprise platform with sales-led procurement; Ranksmith is a budget-friendly beta with self-serve signup and a free trial on every tier. The right pick depends on whether your programme needs enterprise sales-led procurement with full execution layers and revenue attribution, or published beta pricing with citation attribution workflows at a transparent monthly price.
The tools at a glance
Goodie
End-to-end AEO platform covering 12 AI models with agentic commerce and revenue attribution
Goodie is the most complete AEO platform available, covering the full workflow: prompt research, monitoring across twelve AI models, a prioritized optimization actions playbook, agentic commerce visibility, crawler behavior analysis, AEO content generation, and revenue attribution connected to Google Analytics. The Explorer tier starts at $399/month for three engines and 100 prompts, with Pro and Enterprise requiring a demo call. Full twelve-model coverage is available only on Enterprise.
The closed-loop system is the platform's core differentiator. Beyond visibility data, Goodie delivers a prioritized list of optimization actions across owned and earned assets, an Agent Experience Suite that shows how AI crawlers actually traverse your site, an Agentic Commerce Suite for AI shopping surfaces, and a Content Studio that generates AEO-optimized content. For enterprise brands treating AI search as a serious channel with budget to prove ROI, this is the deepest tool in the category.
The accessibility trade-off is real. The Explorer tier is $399/month for just three engines, the Pro and Enterprise tiers require a sales conversation, the API is locked to Enterprise, and multi-brand tracking is Enterprise-only. Goodie also ships an MCP server on all plans including Explorer, which is useful for developer-led teams who want to pull visibility data into AI coding environments. For smaller budgets or solo consultants, the price curve cuts you off early.
| Feature | Explorer $399/mo | Pro Contact sales | Enterprise Contact sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 3 | 6 | Up to 12 |
| Prompts per month | 100 | 250 | 500+ |
| Optimization actions/mo | 10 | 30 | 60+ |
| MCP server access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agentic commerce visibility | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent Experience Suite (crawler logs) | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AEO Content Studio | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue attribution | GA integration | Full | Custom |
| API and data export | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-brand tracking | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Ranksmith
GEO platform tracking 5 AI search engines across prompts, competitors, and citations from $69/mo
Ranksmith is a live, paying GEO platform in public beta that tracks 5 AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude) with prompt prioritization, competitor benchmarking, and source attribution. Pricing is published and self-serve from $69/month with a free trial on every tier and no credit card required.
The product is built around three named modules: Prompt Prioritization, which scores every tracked prompt against current position, mention rate, and link rate; Competitor benchmarking, which surfaces share of voice and sentiment against named competitors in real time; and Source attribution, which extracts the citations AI models rely on so PR and content teams know where to focus review-acquisition and outreach.
The core tracked metrics are AI Authority Index, AI Visibility Rate, Average AI Ranking, Reputation Score, Mentions, Links, Sentiment, and Share of Voice. Coverage is tier-gated: Starter sees ChatGPT and Perplexity only, Pro adds Gemini, and Enterprise unlocks Grok and Claude. There is a separate Free AI Checker utility on the site that runs a single visibility query without signup.
| Feature | Starter $69/mo | Pro $149/mo | Enterprise $549/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts | 25 | 60 | 150 |
| Competitors | 5 | 10 | 20 |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude |
| Historical data | 6 months | 12 months | 24 months |
| Refresh rate | Daily | Daily | Daily |
| Advanced analytics | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Goodie | Ranksmith |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | Up to 12: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, Sparky | 5: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude (tier-gated) |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes (Optimization Actions) | Yes (Citation extraction) |
| Category intelligence | Yes (Prompt Research) | No |
| AEO content generation | Yes (Content Studio) | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | Yes (Agent Experience Suite) | No |
| Page content audits | Yes | No |
| API access | Enterprise only | Not advertised |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No (MCP server all plans) | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | Enterprise only | No |
| Starting price | $399/mo | $69/mo |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Goodie and Ranksmith?
Goodie starts at $399/month and locks Pro and Enterprise behind sales calls, while Ranksmith offers no white-label delivery and no API access on its plans. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool with white-label client reports plus read and write API on every plan from $50/month Starter. For agencies that need branded client reports and programmatic data access without paying $400/month or starting a sales conversation, AI Peekaboo is the self-serve alternative.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
GoodieRanksmithGoodieRanksmithGoodieGoodieRanksmithThe cleanest way to think about these two tools is by their maturity and execution scope. Goodie is a mature enterprise platform with sales-led procurement, twelve-model coverage, agentic commerce, AEO content generation, and Google Analytics revenue attribution. Ranksmith is a budget-friendly public beta with published pricing, free trial, and citation-attribution workflows, but it is in beta with rough edges expected and no API access. Both serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, but the audience and execution depth are very different. Choosing between them is mostly a question of whether you want enterprise execution under one roof or affordable beta tracking with citation workflows.
Bottom line
If you are an enterprise brand with a meaningful AEO budget who needs the widest model coverage, agentic commerce visibility, AEO content generation, crawler logs, and revenue attribution proof, Goodie is the most defensible choice in the category. If you are a marketing team that wants published self-serve beta pricing with Prompt Prioritization scoring and citation extraction workflows from $69/month, Ranksmith delivers a credible mid-market option. The defining question is whether you need enterprise AEO execution or affordable beta tracking with citation attribution.
Frequently asked questions
How does Goodie compare to Ranksmith on AI visibility tool comparison depth?
Goodie has the deeper feature set: twelve-model coverage, AEO content generation, Optimization Actions, Agent Experience Suite, agentic commerce tracking, and Google Analytics revenue attribution. Ranksmith focuses on citation extraction, Prompt Prioritization scoring, and source attribution across five AI engines with tier-gated access. For full-stack Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) execution, Goodie is the more complete answer. For affordable beta tracking with citation workflows, Ranksmith is the more accessible option.
How much does Goodie cost compared to Ranksmith?
Goodie Explorer starts at $399/month for three engines and 100 prompts. Pro and Enterprise pricing requires a demo call. Ranksmith Starter is $69/month for ChatGPT and Perplexity with 25 prompts, Pro is $149/month adding Gemini, and Enterprise is $549/month for all five engines. At the entry tier, Goodie costs roughly six times more than Ranksmith per month for similar coverage.
Which tool is better for citation attribution workflows?
Ranksmith focuses heavily on citation extraction and source attribution, extracting the specific URLs AI models cite in responses to tracked prompts. PR and content teams can use this to prioritize review-acquisition and outreach. Goodie surfaces citations through its core monitoring but does not break out source attribution as a dedicated module. For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams that prioritize citation outreach, Ranksmith is the more focused option.
Is Ranksmith production-ready?
Ranksmith is in public beta with paying customers and an active app at app.getranksmith.com, but the team is still shipping features and refinements. Expect rough edges, and budget time for evaluation before committing long-term. Goodie is a mature enterprise platform with SOC 2-compliant infrastructure and structured onboarding. For teams that need production-grade reliability today, Goodie is the safer choice.
Which tool offers better prompt prioritization?
Ranksmith ships Prompt Prioritization scoring that ranks every tracked prompt against current position, mention rate, and link rate across the engines you have access to. Prompts are filterable by category, model, and region. Goodie's equivalent is the Optimization Actions playbook on Pro and Enterprise, which generates prioritized recommendations. Both approaches help teams focus effort, but Ranksmith's scoring is more transparent on lower tiers.
Does Goodie or Ranksmith offer Google AI Overviews tracking?
Neither tool tracks Google AI Overviews as a distinct surface. Goodie tracks it on Pro and Enterprise as part of its twelve-model coverage. Ranksmith does not currently advertise Google AI Overviews coverage. For teams that need Google AI Overviews tracking specifically, Otterly.AI, LLM Pulse, and Wellows include it on standard tiers.