The Best AI Visibility Tools for Digital PR & Link Building Teams
7 AI visibility tools compared for digital PR and link building work: which ones tell you the exact URL an AI model cited, and which just tell you your brand got a mention.
AI Peekaboo gives you a read and write API on every plan from $50/month, so you can pull share-of-voice and competitor citation data straight into your own prospecting spreadsheet instead of screenshotting a dashboard.
Wellows is the only tool here that pairs citation tracking with pre-sourced outreach contacts, surfacing both the gap and the person to email, though full five-engine coverage requires the $297/domain/month Starter tier.
Athena HQ runs a genuine free GEO audit with real citation data before you pay anything, then adds content gap analysis tied directly to what AI models are citing from competitors once you move to the $295/month Starter plan.
LLMrefs tracks citation sources across 11 AI engines for €79/month flat, and quietly bundles a Reddit threads finder as one of its extra tools, useful when your outreach and Reddit monitoring workflows overlap.
Trakkr has a genuinely usable free tier with no credit card required and logs the source URL behind every AI citation, the fastest way to prove a citation gap exists before you build a case for a paid tool.
Riff Analytics tracks citation sources across 7 engines including Grok and DeepSeek, the widest coverage in this list, but has no API and no white-label view, so treat it as a research input rather than a client deliverable.
Scrunch AI flips the question entirely: instead of tracking your brand, it maps which prompts and domains are driving citations across your whole category first, at $250/month, giving you the competitive landscape before you decide who to pitch.
You already know how to find a broken link or a competitor's weak page. What you probably don't have yet is a reliable way to see which specific URLs ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI Overviews are pulling from when your category comes up, and that data is exactly what turns a generic pitch into a targeted one. Most AI visibility tools are built for brand tracking, not for handing you a prospecting list, so you end up screenshotting a chatbot answer and reverse-engineering the source yourself. Here are 7 tools worth testing, evaluated specifically on whether they show you the cited URL, not just the brand mention, and whether that data turns into something you can act on.
- You can see your brand got mentioned in an AI answer but not which page on your site (or a competitor's) actually got cited
- Nobody on your team is tracking which third-party domains AI models treat as authoritative in your category, so you're guessing at outreach targets
- Content gap reports tell you what to write, but not who to pitch once you've written it
- Every citation-tracking tool you've priced out is built for enterprise brand monitoring budgets, not a lean PR or link team
What you should look for
Does the tool show you the exact URL or domain an AI model cited, or does it stop at "your brand was mentioned"? This is the difference between a data point and a lead.
Once you see a content gap or a competitor citation, does the tool help you act on it, ideally with a contact or a target list, or does it leave you to build that list yourself?
Can you see which domains and pages are getting cited for the competitors in your space, so you know exactly who to approach for a similar placement?
Can you start on a self-serve plan without a demo call and a five-figure contract, since most digital PR and link teams are not buying at enterprise budget?
Tools at a glance
AI Peekaboo earns the top spot here for a practical reason: the read and write API is included on every plan starting at $50/month, so you can pull competitor share-of-voice and mention data directly into whatever spreadsheet or CRM you already use to track outreach targets, instead of manually copying numbers out of a dashboard. When your job is building a target list, not admiring a chart, that distinction matters more than another visualization.
It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, and the competitive share-of-voice feature tells you which competitors are winning citations in your category, which is your starting signal for who to research next. The gap is that it does not surface the specific cited URL the way Wellows, Trakkr, or Athena HQ do, so pair it with one of those when you need source-level granularity.
| Feature | Starter $50/mo | Peek $100/mo | Grow $200/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts included | 40 | 40 | 100 |
| Tracking frequency | Every 2 days | Daily | Daily |
| Data points/mo | 3,000 | 6,000 | 15,000 |
| AI models tracked | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Looker Studio connector | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access (read + write) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
- API access on every plan, including the $50/month Starter
- White-label reports with guest access links, no extra cost
- Pay-per-prompt pricing scales with actual usage, not team size
- Looker Studio connector included on all plans
- Tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode
- No crawler log access (cannot see when GPTBot or ClaudeBot visited your pages)
- Starter plan limited to 40 prompts and tracking every 2 days
- No built-in AEO content generation layer
Wellows
AI visibility platform that tracks citations, optimizes content, and surfaces outreach contacts in one place
Wellows is the closest thing on this list to a tool built for your actual job description. It tracks citations across five AI engines, then surfaces two kinds of outreach opportunity: places where you're not cited but could be, and places where new content is needed to earn a citation, and both come with verified contact information for the site owner. Most tools stop at telling you a gap exists. Wellows hands you the person to email about it.
The catch is cost and coverage: the Lite plan at $37/domain/month only covers ChatGPT, and you need the $297/domain/month Starter tier for all five engines. Per-domain pricing also adds up fast if you're tracking several client brands. Use the 7-day free trial to test the outreach module specifically before you commit to a tier.
| Feature | Lite $37/domain/mo | Essential $97/domain/mo | Starter $297/domain/mo | Pro $497/domain/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answer engines tracked | 1 (ChatGPT) | 2 (ChatGPT, AI Overviews) | 5 (all engines) | 5 (all engines) |
| Prompts tracked per month | 40 | 100 | 400 | 1,000 |
| Responses analyzed per month | 1,200 | 6,000 | 60,000 | 150,000 |
| Content generation credits | 2 | 5 | 15 | 70 |
| Outreach opportunities | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Brand sentiment analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GSC integration | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daily monitoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| All-time history | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Strategic monthly calls | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Content Optimization (beta) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | 7 days | 7 days | 7 days | 7 days |
- Outreach templates with verified contacts included at every tier, not just monitoring
- Content Optimization feature checks existing site pages before recommending new content
- GSC integration on all plans ties AI visibility data to search console signals
- Strategic monthly calls included at every pricing tier, one to five calls depending on plan
- 7-day free trial on every plan with no charge during the trial period
- Full five-engine coverage (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode) requires Starter at $297/domain/month
- Per-domain pricing model gets expensive quickly for agencies managing multiple client domains
- No white-label delivery mentioned for client-facing reports
Athena HQ
Free-to-start GEO audit platform with citation gap analysis and API access on paid plans
Athena HQ's free Essential tier runs an actual citation audit, not a teaser, so you can see which URLs are already being cited in your category before spending a cent. That makes it the fastest way to build an internal case for a bigger citation-tracking investment, or to validate a pitch angle before you spend an afternoon drafting outreach.
The content gap analysis on the $295/month Starter plan compares your site against the topics AI models are citing from competitors, which becomes your outreach and content brief in one step. The jump from free to $295/month with no mid-tier is the real friction point, and citation source tracking itself is locked behind that paid tier.
| Feature | Essential Free | Starter $295/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| GEO audit | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content gap analysis | Basic | Full | Full |
| Citation source tracking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | 2 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
- Free tier with real GEO audit functionality, not just a signup wall
- Content gap analysis tied directly to citation data from AI models
- API access available on paid plans for custom workflow integration
- Covers all four major AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity
- Self-serve, no sales call needed to start
- Jump from free to $295/month is significant with no mid-tier option
- No white-label or client-sharing features
- API restricted to paid plans only
- Does not track Google AI Overviews
LLMrefs
Keyword-based AI search visibility tracking across 11 engines with share of voice, citations, and unlimited agency seats
LLMrefs takes your existing keyword list, generates 25 fan-out prompts per keyword based on real conversational patterns, and shows you every domain cited alongside your brand and your competitors' for each one. Because it's keyword-first rather than prompt-first, you can plug in the same terms you're already targeting for backlinks and see the citation landscape for them immediately.
One €79/month plan covers unlimited seats and projects, unlimited domains, CSV export, and API access, and it bundles a Reddit threads finder alongside an AI crawlability checker, useful if your citation-source research and Reddit outreach work already overlap. The gap is a white-label client portal: you'll be exporting and rebuilding reports in your own format rather than handing over a branded dashboard.
| Feature | All in One €79/month |
|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 11 (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, DeepSeek, ChatGPT Search, AI Mode) |
| Max prompts tracked | 500 per organization |
| Prompts per keyword | Auto-generated fan-out, typically 25 |
| Projects | Unlimited |
| Team seats | Unlimited |
| Keywords per project | Unlimited |
| Geo-targeting | 50+ countries |
| Language support | 10+ languages |
| Data refresh | Weekly automated, real-time analysis |
| CSV export | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ |
| Source citation tracking | ✓ |
| Content gap analysis | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ |
| Priority support | ✓ |
| Custom feature requests | ✓ |
| Bonus tools included | AI crawlability checker, Reddit threads finder, LLMs.txt generator |
| Free trial | 7 days, no credit card |
- Covers 11 AI engines: ChatGPT, ChatGPT Search, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, and DeepSeek
- Keyword-based tracking: import existing SEO keyword lists directly without prompt engineering
- Auto-generates 25 fan-out prompts per keyword based on real user conversation patterns
- Unlimited projects and unlimited team seats on a single €79/month subscription
- Geo-targeting across 50+ countries and 10+ languages
- Share of voice and position metrics aggregated across all prompts for statistical significance
- Identifies content gaps: keywords where competitors rank in AI but your brand does not
- Full source and citation tracking shows which domains carry authority in your category
- CSV export and API access included for custom reporting workflows
- 7-day free trial with no credit card required
- Priced in euros (€79/month), creating currency fluctuation risk for USD-based teams
- No white-label client portal for sharing branded dashboards directly with clients
- API capabilities are under-documented on the public website
- Fixed plan with no lower entry point for solo practitioners with a single domain
- Track limit of 500 prompts per organization (not unlimited)
Trakkr
Free-tier AI search monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with citation source tracking
Trakkr logs the source URL behind every AI citation on every tier, including the free one, which makes it the cheapest way to see that a competitor's blog post is being cited repeatedly for a query your own content should be answering. Start here with no credit card, confirm the gap is real, then decide whether to build a case for a paid tool.
The free tier is limited in query volume and monitoring frequency, and there's no white-label delivery on any plan, so it's a research input for your own workflow rather than something you hand a client directly. Paid plans start at $100/month for Growth and add API access.
| Feature | Free Free | Growth $100/month | Scale $500/month | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Monitoring frequency | Limited | Regular | Daily | Custom |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor tracking | 1 competitor | Up to 5 | Up to 20 | Custom |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | On request |
| Email alerts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
- Free tier available with no credit card required, covers the core 4 AI models
- Citation source tracking shows which URLs are cited in AI answers, not just which brands
- Competitor share-of-voice benchmarking included
- API access on paid plans
- Clear self-serve pricing with no sales call required
- Free tier is limited in query volume and monitoring frequency
- No white-label delivery or guest access links for client reporting
- Four-model coverage misses Grok, DeepSeek, Microsoft Copilot, and Google AI Mode
- Support is less mature than established enterprise platforms
- No built-in action plan or content recommendation layer
Riff Analytics
AI brand visibility tracking across 7 LLM engines with citation source analysis, sentiment monitoring, and competitor benchmarking
Riff Analytics tracks 7 AI engines, including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama on top of the usual suspects, and its citation source tracking tells you whether AI engines are pulling from your blog, a review site, press coverage, or a competitor's content. That breadth is useful if your audience spreads across more than the top two or three assistants, which is increasingly common.
There's no API and no white-label delivery on either plan, so it's built for your own research process rather than for handing data to a client. At $49/month for Starter it's affordable for that purpose, though the jump to $199/month Pro is documented thinly.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Pro $199/mo |
|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 7 | 7 |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI readiness audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Looker Studio connector | ✗ | ✗ |
- Tracks 7 AI models including Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama alongside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini
- Citation source tracking shows which URLs and domains AI engines pull from when mentioning your brand
- Competitor benchmarking for share-of-voice across the same prompt set
- AI readiness audit to identify gaps before monitoring begins
- Clean, self-serve onboarding with no sales call required
- No API access on any plan, limiting integration with existing reporting stacks
- No white-label delivery or client guest views, making it unsuitable for agency use
- The Pro plan at $199/month is a significant step up from Starter without clear tier differentiation in public documentation
- No Looker Studio connector or BI export options
- Newer platform with a shorter track record than Profound or Scrunch AI
Scrunch AI asks a different question than the rest of this list, and it's a genuinely useful one for you: instead of starting with your brand, it maps which prompts are driving citations across your entire category and who is winning them. That gives you the competitive citation landscape before you've picked a single outreach target, which is a stronger starting point than reacting to your own gaps one at a time.
The 1,000-prompt industry library on the $250/month Starter plan saves you from building a prompt set from nothing, and the page audit flags which of your own pages are closest to citation-ready. There's no API on standard plans and no white-label delivery, so this is a strategic research layer, not a client-reporting tool.
| Feature | Starter $250/mo | Growth $417/mo | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|
| User licenses | 3 | 5 | Custom |
| Custom prompts | 350 | 700 | Custom |
| Industry prompts | 1,000 | 2,500 | Custom |
| Personas | 3 | 5 | Custom |
| Page audits | 5 | 10 | Custom |
| Enterprise Data API | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| SAML / OIDC security | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated GTM team | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
- Category-level citation intelligence shows which prompts drive AI mentions across your whole niche
- 1,000-prompt industry library on Starter means you are not building your prompt set from scratch
- Tracks 5 AI engines including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot
- Persona-based analysis lets you filter citation patterns by user type
- Page audit feature identifies which of your existing pages are most citation-ready
- Starts at $250/month, the most expensive of the three in this comparison
- API access is Enterprise-only, no data portability on standard plans
- No white-label delivery or agency client reporting features
- No crawler log access
- No built-in content generation
Which AI visibility tool should you actually use for citation-source outreach?
The question you're really asking with any of these tools is whether it tells you the URL, not just the brand. AI Peekaboo earns the top spot for you because the API is on every plan from $50/month, so citation and share-of-voice data flows into whatever tracker you already run your outreach from, though it stops short of naming the specific cited page the way a few others here do. Wellows is the one built closest to your actual job: citation tracking plus pre-sourced contacts for the gaps it finds, at a real cost once you need all five engines. Athena HQ and Trakkr both let you prove a gap exists for free or nearly free before you ask for budget, and LLMrefs is the strongest fit if you're already running keyword lists you want to extend into AI citation data without learning a new workflow. Riff Analytics and Scrunch AI serve narrower jobs well, wider engine coverage for one, category-level citation mapping for the other, and neither is trying to be a general-purpose tool. Start with whichever one answers the question you're actually stuck on: do you need proof a gap exists, a contact to email, or the full competitive picture first.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI visibility tool for finding backlink and citation opportunities?
Wellows is the strongest fit if you want citation gaps paired with verified outreach contacts in one place, though full five-engine coverage requires its $297/domain/month Starter tier. Athena HQ and Trakkr both let you confirm a citation gap exists for free before you spend anything, and AI Peekaboo is the pick if you want that data flowing into your own tracker via API from $50/month.
Can I see which specific URL an AI model cited, not just that my brand was mentioned?
Yes, several tools do this well. Trakkr, Riff Analytics, and LLMrefs all log the source URL behind a citation on their standard plans, and Athena HQ adds it on its paid Starter tier. AI Peekaboo and Scrunch AI focus more on share-of-voice and category-level patterns than individual cited URLs.
Is there a free way to check if AI models are citing my competitors instead of me?
Trakkr's free tier tracks citation sources across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with no credit card required, and Athena HQ's free Essential plan runs a real GEO audit showing where competitors have a stronger citation footprint. Both are strong enough to build an internal case before you pay for anything.
Which tool gives me outreach contacts, not just citation data?
Wellows is the one built specifically for this: its outreach module surfaces both the citation gap and verified contact details for the relevant site owner, on every plan including the $37/domain/month Lite tier. No other tool in this list pre-sources contacts the same way.
Do any of these tools have an API for pulling citation data into my own reports?
AI Peekaboo includes a read and write API on every plan from $50/month. LLMrefs and Trakkr include API access too, on their all-in-one €79/month plan and $100/month Growth plan respectively. Wellows, Riff Analytics, and Scrunch AI do not offer API access on standard plans.
Is it worth paying for a category-level citation tool instead of tracking my own brand directly?
It depends on where you are in the process. If you already know your target keywords and just need to find gaps, brand-level tools like Trakkr or Athena HQ get you there faster and cheaper. Scrunch AI's category-first approach at $250/month is worth it once you want the full competitive citation landscape before deciding who to pitch, rather than reacting to your own gaps one at a time.